Core i5-12400 vs Ryzen 9 5900HS
Description
The i5-12400 is based on Alder Lake architecture while the 5900HS is based on Zen 3.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-12400 gets a score of 552.6 k points while the 5900HS gets 431.6 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-12400 is 1.3 times faster than the 5900HS. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-12400 gets a score of 552.6 k points while the 5900HS gets 431.6 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-12400 is 1.3 times faster than the 5900HS. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
90675
a50f00
Core
Arder Lake-S
Cezanne
Base frecuency
2.5 GHz
3 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.4 GHz
4.6 GHz
Socket
LGA 1700
BGA-FP6
Cores/Threads
6/12
8/16
TDP
65 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x48 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
6x1280 kB
8x512 kB
Cache L3
18432 kB
16384 kB
Date
January 2022
December 2021
Mean monothread perf.
99.72k points
77.15k points
Mean multithread perf.
552.59k points
431.56k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-12400
5900HS
Test#1 (Integers)
46.08k
19.54k (x0.42)
Test#2 (FP)
25.51k
23.8k (x0.93)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
13.4k
10.82k (x0.81)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.73k
22.98k (x1.56)
TOTAL
99.72k
77.15k (x0.77)
Multithread
i5-12400
5900HS
Test#1 (Integers)
237.35k
144.64k (x0.61)
Test#2 (FP)
201.2k
196.86k (x0.98)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
97.8k
84.22k (x0.86)
Test#1 (Memory)
16.24k
5.84k (x0.36)
TOTAL
552.59k
431.56k (x0.78)
Performance/W
i5-12400
5900HS
Test#1 (Integers)
3652 points/W
4132 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3095 points/W
5625 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1505 points/W
2406 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
250 points/W
167 points/W
TOTAL
8501 points/W
12330 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-12400
5900HS
Test#1 (Integers)
10472 points/GHz
4248 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5798 points/GHz
5175 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3046 points/GHz
2352 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3348 points/GHz
4996 points/GHz
TOTAL
22665 points/GHz
16771 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4