| | | | | | |

Core i9-11900KB vs i3-1005G1


Description
The i9-11900KB is based on Tiger Lake architecture while the i3-1005G1 is based on Ice Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i9-11900KB gets a score of 537.2 k points while the i3-1005G1 gets 116.6 k points.

Summarizing, the i9-11900KB is 4.6 times faster than the i3-1005G1. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
806d1
706e5
Core
Tiger Lake-H
Ice Lake-U
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.3 GHz
1.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.9 GHz
3.4 GHz
Socket
BGA 1787
BGA 1526
Cores/Threads
8/16
2/4
TDP
65 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x48 kB
2x32+2x48 kB
Cache L2
8x1280 kB
2x512 kB
Cache L3
24576 kB
4096 kB
Date
July 2021
August 2019
Mean monothread perf.
63.79k points
50.62k points
Mean multithread perf.
537.18k points
116.63k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i9-11900KB
i3-1005G1
Test#1 (Integers)
24.09k
19.45k (x0.81)
Test#2 (FP)
19.54k
16.75k (x0.86)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.48k
8.04k (x0.95)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.68k
6.38k (x0.55)
TOTAL
63.79k
50.62k (x0.79)

Multithread

i9-11900KB

i3-1005G1
Test#1 (Integers)
220.79k
46.52k (x0.21)
Test#2 (FP)
225.98k
48.76k (x0.22)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
79.1k
17.12k (x0.22)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.32k
4.23k (x0.37)
TOTAL
537.18k
116.63k (x0.22)

Performance/W
i9-11900KB
i3-1005G1
Test#1 (Integers)
3397 points/W
3102 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3477 points/W
3251 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1217 points/W
1141 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
174 points/W
282 points/W
TOTAL
8264 points/W
7776 points/W

Performance/GHz
i9-11900KB
i3-1005G1
Test#1 (Integers)
4917 points/GHz
5721 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3988 points/GHz
4926 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1730 points/GHz
2365 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2384 points/GHz
1877 points/GHz
TOTAL
13018 points/GHz
14889 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4