Core i9-11900KB vs Ryzen 9 5900HX
Description
The i9-11900KB is based on Tiger Lake architecture while the 5900HX is based on Zen 3.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i9-11900KB gets a score of 537.2 k points while the 5900HX gets 421.1 k points.
Summarizing, the i9-11900KB is 1.3 times faster than the 5900HX. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i9-11900KB gets a score of 537.2 k points while the 5900HX gets 421.1 k points.
Summarizing, the i9-11900KB is 1.3 times faster than the 5900HX. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
806d1
a50f00
Core
Tiger Lake-H
Cezanne
Base frecuency
3.3 GHz
3.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.9 GHz
4.6 GHz
Socket
BGA 1787
BGA1140-FP6
Cores/Threads
8/16
8/16
TDP
65 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x48 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
8x1280 kB
8x512 kB
Cache L3
24576 kB
16384 kB
Date
July 2021
January 2021
Mean monothread perf.
63.79k points
85.76k points
Mean multithread perf.
537.18k points
421.05k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i9-11900KB
5900HX
Test#1 (Integers)
24.09k
23.29k (x0.97)
Test#2 (FP)
19.54k
25.89k (x1.33)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.48k
11.75k (x1.39)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.68k
24.83k (x2.13)
TOTAL
63.79k
85.76k (x1.34)
Multithread
i9-11900KB
5900HX
Test#1 (Integers)
220.79k
138.16k (x0.63)
Test#2 (FP)
225.98k
192.12k (x0.85)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
79.1k
80.84k (x1.02)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.32k
9.93k (x0.88)
TOTAL
537.18k
421.05k (x0.78)
Performance/W
i9-11900KB
5900HX
Test#1 (Integers)
3397 points/W
3070 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3477 points/W
4269 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1217 points/W
1796 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
174 points/W
221 points/W
TOTAL
8264 points/W
9357 points/W
Performance/GHz
i9-11900KB
5900HX
Test#1 (Integers)
4917 points/GHz
5064 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3988 points/GHz
5628 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1730 points/GHz
2555 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2384 points/GHz
5398 points/GHz
TOTAL
13018 points/GHz
18644 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4