Core i9-11900KB vs Ryzen 7 4800HS
Description
The i9-11900KB is based on Tiger Lake architecture while the 4800HS is based on Zen 2.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i9-11900KB gets a score of 537.2 k points while the 4800HS gets 427.6 k points.
Summarizing, the i9-11900KB is 1.3 times faster than the 4800HS. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i9-11900KB gets a score of 537.2 k points while the 4800HS gets 427.6 k points.
Summarizing, the i9-11900KB is 1.3 times faster than the 4800HS. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
806d1
860f01
Core
Tiger Lake-H
Renoir
Base frecuency
3.3 GHz
2.9 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.9 GHz
4.2 GHz
Socket
BGA 1787
BGA 1140
Cores/Threads
8/16
8/16
TDP
65 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x48 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
8x1280 kB
8x512 kB
Cache L3
24576 kB
2x4096 kB
Date
July 2021
March 2020
Mean monothread perf.
63.79k points
61.12k points
Mean multithread perf.
537.18k points
427.61k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i9-11900KB
4800HS
Test#1 (Integers)
24.09k
16.66k (x0.69)
Test#2 (FP)
19.54k
26.01k (x1.33)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.48k
9.31k (x1.1)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.68k
9.15k (x0.78)
TOTAL
63.79k
61.12k (x0.96)
Multithread
i9-11900KB
4800HS
Test#1 (Integers)
220.79k
144.48k (x0.65)
Test#2 (FP)
225.98k
192.46k (x0.85)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
79.1k
83.17k (x1.05)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.32k
7.51k (x0.66)
TOTAL
537.18k
427.61k (x0.8)
Performance/W
i9-11900KB
4800HS
Test#1 (Integers)
3397 points/W
4128 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3477 points/W
5499 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1217 points/W
2376 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
174 points/W
214 points/W
TOTAL
8264 points/W
12218 points/W
Performance/GHz
i9-11900KB
4800HS
Test#1 (Integers)
4917 points/GHz
3966 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3988 points/GHz
6194 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1730 points/GHz
2216 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2384 points/GHz
2177 points/GHz
TOTAL
13018 points/GHz
14553 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4