Core i9-11900KB vs Ryzen 5 3600
Description
The i9-11900KB is based on Tiger Lake architecture while the 3600 is based on Zen 2.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i9-11900KB gets a score of 537.2 k points while the 3600 gets 348.4 k points.
Summarizing, the i9-11900KB is 1.5 times faster than the 3600. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i9-11900KB gets a score of 537.2 k points while the 3600 gets 348.4 k points.
Summarizing, the i9-11900KB is 1.5 times faster than the 3600. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
806d1
870f10
Core
Tiger Lake-H
Matisse
Base frecuency
3.3 GHz
3.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.9 GHz
4.2 GHz
Socket
BGA 1787
AM4
Cores/Threads
8/16
6/12
TDP
65 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x48 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
8x1280 kB
6x512 kB
Cache L3
24576 kB
32768 kB
Date
July 2021
July 2019
Mean monothread perf.
63.79k points
70.55k points
Mean multithread perf.
537.18k points
348.35k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i9-11900KB
3600
Test#1 (Integers)
24.09k
16.04k (x0.67)
Test#2 (FP)
19.54k
24.47k (x1.25)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.48k
8.38k (x0.99)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.68k
21.66k (x1.85)
TOTAL
63.79k
70.55k (x1.11)
Multithread
i9-11900KB
3600
Test#1 (Integers)
220.79k
113.63k (x0.51)
Test#2 (FP)
225.98k
143.55k (x0.64)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
79.1k
63.84k (x0.81)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.32k
27.34k (x2.42)
TOTAL
537.18k
348.35k (x0.65)
Performance/W
i9-11900KB
3600
Test#1 (Integers)
3397 points/W
1748 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3477 points/W
2208 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1217 points/W
982 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
174 points/W
421 points/W
TOTAL
8264 points/W
5359 points/W
Performance/GHz
i9-11900KB
3600
Test#1 (Integers)
4917 points/GHz
3819 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3988 points/GHz
5825 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1730 points/GHz
1995 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2384 points/GHz
5158 points/GHz
TOTAL
13018 points/GHz
16797 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4