| | | | | | |

Core i9-11900KB vs i5-13400


Description
The i9-11900KB is based on Tiger Lake architecture while the i5-13400 is based on Raptor Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i9-11900KB gets a score of 537.2 k points while the i5-13400 gets 497.8 k points.

Summarizing, the i9-11900KB is 1.1 times faster than the i5-13400. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
806d1
b06f2
Core
Tiger Lake-H
Raptor Lake-S
Architecture
Tiger Lake
Base frecuency
3.3 GHz
2.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.9 GHz
4.6 GHz
Socket
BGA 1787
LGA 1700
Cores/Threads
8/16
10/16
TDP
65 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x48 kB
6x32/4x64+6x48/4x32 kB
Cache L2
8x1280 kB
6x2048+4x4096 kB
Cache L3
24576 kB
20480 kB
Date
July 2021
January 2023
Mean monothread perf.
63.79k points
100.11k points
Mean multithread perf.
537.18k points
497.83k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i9-11900KB
i5-13400
Test#1 (Integers)
24.09k
47.01k (x1.95)
Test#2 (FP)
19.54k
26.73k (x1.37)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.48k
14.28k (x1.68)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.68k
12.1k (x1.04)
TOTAL
63.79k
100.11k (x1.57)

Multithread

i9-11900KB

i5-13400
Test#1 (Integers)
220.79k
228.2k (x1.03)
Test#2 (FP)
225.98k
160.28k (x0.71)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
79.1k
71.12k (x0.9)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.32k
38.23k (x3.38)
TOTAL
537.18k
497.83k (x0.93)

Performance/W
i9-11900KB
i5-13400
Test#1 (Integers)
3397 points/W
3511 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3477 points/W
2466 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1217 points/W
1094 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
174 points/W
588 points/W
TOTAL
8264 points/W
7659 points/W

Performance/GHz
i9-11900KB
i5-13400
Test#1 (Integers)
4917 points/GHz
10219 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3988 points/GHz
5811 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1730 points/GHz
3103 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2384 points/GHz
2630 points/GHz
TOTAL
13018 points/GHz
21763 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4