| | | | | | |

Core i9-11900KB vs i3-1220P


Description
The i9-11900KB is based on Tiger Lake architecture while the i3-1220P is based on Alder Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i9-11900KB gets a score of 537.2 k points while the i3-1220P gets 404.7 k points.

Summarizing, the i9-11900KB is 1.3 times faster than the i3-1220P. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
806d1
906a4
Core
Tiger Lake-H
Alder Lake-P
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.3 GHz
1.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.9 GHz
4.4 GHz
Socket
BGA 1787
BGA 1744
Cores/Threads
8/16
10/12
TDP
65 W
28 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x48 kB
2x32/8x64+2x48/8x32 kB
Cache L2
8x1280 kB
2x1280/2x2048 kB
Cache L3
24576 kB
12288 kB
Date
July 2021
March 2022
Mean monothread perf.
63.79k points
81.92k points
Mean multithread perf.
537.18k points
404.74k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i9-11900KB
i3-1220P
Test#1 (Integers)
24.09k
37.43k (x1.55)
Test#2 (FP)
19.54k
19.6k (x1)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.48k
12.99k (x1.53)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.68k
11.9k (x1.02)
TOTAL
63.79k
81.92k (x1.28)

Multithread

i9-11900KB

i3-1220P
Test#1 (Integers)
220.79k
178.85k (x0.81)
Test#2 (FP)
225.98k
153.82k (x0.68)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
79.1k
69.38k (x0.88)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.32k
2.69k (x0.24)
TOTAL
537.18k
404.74k (x0.75)

Performance/W
i9-11900KB
i3-1220P
Test#1 (Integers)
3397 points/W
6387 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3477 points/W
5494 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1217 points/W
2478 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
174 points/W
96 points/W
TOTAL
8264 points/W
14455 points/W

Performance/GHz
i9-11900KB
i3-1220P
Test#1 (Integers)
4917 points/GHz
8506 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3988 points/GHz
4455 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1730 points/GHz
2953 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2384 points/GHz
2704 points/GHz
TOTAL
13018 points/GHz
18618 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4