| | | | | | |

Core i9-11900KB vs i7-11700F


Description
The i9-11900KB is based on Tiger Lake architecture while the i7-11700F is based on Rocket Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i9-11900KB gets a score of 537.2 k points while the i7-11700F gets 512.3 k points.

Summarizing, the i9-11900KB is 1 times faster than the i7-11700F. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
806d1
a0671
Core
Tiger Lake-H
Rocket Lake-S
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.3 GHz
2.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.9 GHz
4.9 GHz
Socket
BGA 1787
LGA 1200
Cores/Threads
8/16
8/16
TDP
65 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x48 kB
8x32+8x48 kB
Cache L2
8x1280 kB
8x512 kB
Cache L3
24576 kB
16384 kB
Date
July 2021
March 2021
Mean monothread perf.
63.79k points
89.58k points
Mean multithread perf.
537.18k points
512.32k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i9-11900KB
i7-11700F
Test#1 (Integers)
24.09k
32.55k (x1.35)
Test#2 (FP)
19.54k
26.95k (x1.38)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.48k
10.76k (x1.27)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.68k
19.32k (x1.65)
TOTAL
63.79k
89.58k (x1.4)

Multithread

i9-11900KB

i7-11700F
Test#1 (Integers)
220.79k
232.06k (x1.05)
Test#2 (FP)
225.98k
203.56k (x0.9)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
79.1k
72.89k (x0.92)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.32k
3.81k (x0.34)
TOTAL
537.18k
512.32k (x0.95)

Performance/W
i9-11900KB
i7-11700F
Test#1 (Integers)
3397 points/W
3570 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3477 points/W
3132 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1217 points/W
1121 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
174 points/W
59 points/W
TOTAL
8264 points/W
7882 points/W

Performance/GHz
i9-11900KB
i7-11700F
Test#1 (Integers)
4917 points/GHz
6642 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3988 points/GHz
5500 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1730 points/GHz
2196 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2384 points/GHz
3943 points/GHz
TOTAL
13018 points/GHz
18281 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4