| | | | | | |

Core i9-11900KB vs i7-1165G7


Description
Both models i9-11900KB and i7-1165G7 are based on Tiger Lake architecture.

It’s the 11th generation of Core CPUs and it’s manufactured in the 10nm SuperFin process.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i9-11900KB gets a score of 537.2 k points while the i7-1165G7 gets 210.4 k points.

Summarizing, the i9-11900KB is 2.6 times faster than the i7-1165G7. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
806d1
806c1
Core
Tiger Lake-H
Tiger Lake-UP3
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.3 GHz
2.8 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.9 GHz
4.7 GHz
Socket
BGA 1787
BGA 1449
Cores/Threads
8/16
4/8
TDP
65 W
28 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x48 kB
4x32+4x48 kB
Cache L2
8x1280 kB
4x1280 kB
Cache L3
24576 kB
12288 kB
Date
July 2021
September 2020
Mean monothread perf.
63.79k points
62.1k points
Mean multithread perf.
537.18k points
210.4k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i9-11900KB
i7-1165G7
Test#1 (Integers)
24.09k
22.97k (x0.95)
Test#2 (FP)
19.54k
21.61k (x1.11)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.48k
8.99k (x1.06)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.68k
8.52k (x0.73)
TOTAL
63.79k
62.1k (x0.97)

Multithread

i9-11900KB

i7-1165G7
Test#1 (Integers)
220.79k
82.75k (x0.37)
Test#2 (FP)
225.98k
86.58k (x0.38)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
79.1k
29.34k (x0.37)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.32k
11.72k (x1.04)
TOTAL
537.18k
210.4k (x0.39)

Performance/W
i9-11900KB
i7-1165G7
Test#1 (Integers)
3397 points/W
2955 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3477 points/W
3092 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1217 points/W
1048 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
174 points/W
419 points/W
TOTAL
8264 points/W
7514 points/W

Performance/GHz
i9-11900KB
i7-1165G7
Test#1 (Integers)
4917 points/GHz
4887 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3988 points/GHz
4599 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1730 points/GHz
1912 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2384 points/GHz
1813 points/GHz
TOTAL
13018 points/GHz
13212 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4