| | | | | | |

Core i9-11900K vs i7-11800H (ES)


Description
The i9-11900K is based on Rocket Lake architecture while the i7-11800H (ES) is based on Tiger Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i9-11900K gets a score of 748 k points while the i7-11800H (ES) gets 709.9 k points.

Summarizing, the i9-11900K is 1.1 times faster than the i7-11800H (ES). To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
a0671
806d0
Core
Rocket Lake-S
Tiger Lake-H
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.5 GHz
2.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
5.3 GHz
4.6 GHz
Socket
LGA 1200
BGA 1787
Cores/Threads
8/16
8/16
TDP
125 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x48 kB
8x32+8x48 kB
Cache L2
8x512 kB
8x1280 kB
Cache L3
16386 kB
24576 kB
Date
March 2021
May 2021
Mean monothread perf.
101.11k points
81.62k points
Mean multithread perf.
748.02k points
709.85k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i9-11900K
i7-11800H (ES)
Test#1 (Integers)
36.08k
30.84k (x0.85)
Test#2 (FP)
30.19k
26.38k (x0.87)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
12.96k
12.66k (x0.98)
Test#1 (Memory)
21.88k
11.74k (x0.54)
TOTAL
101.11k
81.62k (x0.81)

Multithread

i9-11900K

i7-11800H (ES)
Test#1 (Integers)
311.76k
294.86k (x0.95)
Test#2 (FP)
314.01k
280.92k (x0.89)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
112.23k
113.9k (x1.01)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.02k
20.16k (x2.01)
TOTAL
748.02k
709.85k (x0.95)

Performance/W
i9-11900K
i7-11800H (ES)
Test#1 (Integers)
2494 points/W
6553 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2512 points/W
6243 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
898 points/W
2531 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
80 points/W
448 points/W
TOTAL
5984 points/W
15774 points/W

Performance/GHz
i9-11900K
i7-11800H (ES)
Test#1 (Integers)
6807 points/GHz
6705 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5695 points/GHz
5734 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2446 points/GHz
2752 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
4129 points/GHz
2552 points/GHz
TOTAL
19077 points/GHz
17744 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4