Core i9-11900K vs Ryzen 9 5900HS
Description
The i9-11900K is based on Rocket Lake architecture while the 5900HS is based on Zen 3.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i9-11900K gets a score of 748 k points while the 5900HS gets 435 k points.
Summarizing, the i9-11900K is 1.7 times faster than the 5900HS. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i9-11900K gets a score of 748 k points while the 5900HS gets 435 k points.
Summarizing, the i9-11900K is 1.7 times faster than the 5900HS. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
a0671
a50f00
Core
Rocket Lake-S
Cezanne
Base frecuency
3.5 GHz
3 GHz
Boost frecuency
5.3 GHz
4.6 GHz
Socket
LGA 1200
BGA-FP6
Cores/Threads
8/16
8/16
TDP
125 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x48 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
8x512 kB
8x512 kB
Cache L3
16386 kB
16384 kB
Date
March 2021
December 2021
Mean monothread perf.
101.11k points
81.87k points
Mean multithread perf.
748.02k points
434.96k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i9-11900K
5900HS
Test#1 (Integers)
36.08k
21.2k (x0.59)
Test#2 (FP)
30.19k
25k (x0.83)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
12.96k
11.44k (x0.88)
Test#1 (Memory)
21.88k
24.22k (x1.11)
TOTAL
101.11k
81.87k (x0.81)
Multithread
i9-11900K
5900HS
Test#1 (Integers)
311.76k
145.13k (x0.47)
Test#2 (FP)
314.01k
198.36k (x0.63)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
112.23k
85.67k (x0.76)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.02k
5.79k (x0.58)
TOTAL
748.02k
434.96k (x0.58)
Performance/W
i9-11900K
5900HS
Test#1 (Integers)
2494 points/W
4147 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2512 points/W
5667 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
898 points/W
2448 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
80 points/W
166 points/W
TOTAL
5984 points/W
12427 points/W
Performance/GHz
i9-11900K
5900HS
Test#1 (Integers)
6807 points/GHz
4608 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5695 points/GHz
5436 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2446 points/GHz
2488 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
4129 points/GHz
5266 points/GHz
TOTAL
19077 points/GHz
17797 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4