| | | | | | |

Core i9-11900K vs i9-13900KF


Description
The i9-11900K is based on Rocket Lake architecture while the i9-13900KF is based on Raptor Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i9-11900K gets a score of 748 k points while the i9-13900KF gets 1660 k points.

Summarizing, the i9-13900KF is 2.2 times faster than the i9-11900K. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
a0671
b0671
Core
Rocket Lake-S
Raptor Lake-S
Architecture
Rocket Lake
Base frecuency
3.5 GHz
3 GHz
Boost frecuency
5.3 GHz
5.8 GHz
Socket
LGA 1200
LGA 1700
Cores/Threads
8/16
24/32
TDP
125 W
125 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x48 kB
8x32/16x64+8x48/16x32 kB
Cache L2
8x512 kB
8x2048/4x4096 kB
Cache L3
16386 kB
36864 kB
Date
March 2021
September 2022
Mean monothread perf.
101.11k points
128.79k points
Mean multithread perf.
748.02k points
1660.01k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i9-11900K
i9-13900KF
Test#1 (Integers)
36.08k
61.1k (x1.69)
Test#2 (FP)
30.19k
31.23k (x1.03)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
12.96k
17.57k (x1.36)
Test#1 (Memory)
21.88k
18.89k (x0.86)
TOTAL
101.11k
128.79k (x1.27)

Multithread

i9-11900K

i9-13900KF
Test#1 (Integers)
311.76k
767.22k (x2.46)
Test#2 (FP)
314.01k
576.38k (x1.84)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
112.23k
284.31k (x2.53)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.02k
32.09k (x3.2)
TOTAL
748.02k
1660.01k (x2.22)

Performance/W
i9-11900K
i9-13900KF
Test#1 (Integers)
2494 points/W
6138 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2512 points/W
4611 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
898 points/W
2274 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
80 points/W
257 points/W
TOTAL
5984 points/W
13280 points/W

Performance/GHz
i9-11900K
i9-13900KF
Test#1 (Integers)
6807 points/GHz
10535 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5695 points/GHz
5384 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2446 points/GHz
3030 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
4129 points/GHz
3257 points/GHz
TOTAL
19077 points/GHz
22206 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4