| | | | | | |

Core i9-11900K vs i9-13900HX


Description
The i9-11900K is based on Rocket Lake architecture while the i9-13900HX is based on Raptor Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i9-11900K gets a score of 748 k points while the i9-13900HX gets 1160.7 k points.

Summarizing, the i9-13900HX is 1.6 times faster than the i9-11900K. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
a0671
b0671
Core
Rocket Lake-S
Raptor Lake-HX
Architecture
Rocket Lake
Base frecuency
3.5 GHz
2.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
5.3 GHz
5.4 GHz
Socket
LGA 1200
BGA 1964
Cores/Threads
8/16
24/32
TDP
125 W
55 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x48 kB
8x32/16x64+8x48/16x32 kB
Cache L2
8x512 kB
8x2048/4x4096 kB
Cache L3
16386 kB
36864 kB
Date
March 2021
January 2023
Mean monothread perf.
101.11k points
112.85k points
Mean multithread perf.
748.02k points
1160.72k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i9-11900K
i9-13900HX
Test#1 (Integers)
36.08k
53.69k (x1.49)
Test#2 (FP)
30.19k
28.76k (x0.95)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
12.96k
14.93k (x1.15)
Test#1 (Memory)
21.88k
15.47k (x0.71)
TOTAL
101.11k
112.85k (x1.12)

Multithread

i9-11900K

i9-13900HX
Test#1 (Integers)
311.76k
526.44k (x1.69)
Test#2 (FP)
314.01k
420.48k (x1.34)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
112.23k
196.13k (x1.75)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.02k
17.68k (x1.76)
TOTAL
748.02k
1160.72k (x1.55)

Performance/W
i9-11900K
i9-13900HX
Test#1 (Integers)
2494 points/W
9572 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2512 points/W
7645 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
898 points/W
3566 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
80 points/W
321 points/W
TOTAL
5984 points/W
21104 points/W

Performance/GHz
i9-11900K
i9-13900HX
Test#1 (Integers)
6807 points/GHz
9942 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5695 points/GHz
5326 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2446 points/GHz
2765 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
4129 points/GHz
2865 points/GHz
TOTAL
19077 points/GHz
20898 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4