| | | | | | |

Core i9-11900K vs i7-1165G7


Description
The i9-11900K is based on Rocket Lake architecture while the i7-1165G7 is based on Tiger Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i9-11900K gets a score of 748 k points while the i7-1165G7 gets 210.4 k points.

Summarizing, the i9-11900K is 3.6 times faster than the i7-1165G7. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
a0671
806c1
Core
Rocket Lake-S
Tiger Lake-UP3
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.5 GHz
2.8 GHz
Boost frecuency
5.3 GHz
4.7 GHz
Socket
LGA 1200
BGA 1449
Cores/Threads
8/16
4/8
TDP
125 W
28 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x48 kB
4x32+4x48 kB
Cache L2
8x512 kB
4x1280 kB
Cache L3
16386 kB
12288 kB
Date
March 2021
September 2020
Mean monothread perf.
101.11k points
62.1k points
Mean multithread perf.
748.02k points
210.4k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i9-11900K
i7-1165G7
Test#1 (Integers)
36.08k
22.97k (x0.64)
Test#2 (FP)
30.19k
21.61k (x0.72)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
12.96k
8.99k (x0.69)
Test#1 (Memory)
21.88k
8.52k (x0.39)
TOTAL
101.11k
62.1k (x0.61)

Multithread

i9-11900K

i7-1165G7
Test#1 (Integers)
311.76k
82.75k (x0.27)
Test#2 (FP)
314.01k
86.58k (x0.28)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
112.23k
29.34k (x0.26)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.02k
11.72k (x1.17)
TOTAL
748.02k
210.4k (x0.28)

Performance/W
i9-11900K
i7-1165G7
Test#1 (Integers)
2494 points/W
2955 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2512 points/W
3092 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
898 points/W
1048 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
80 points/W
419 points/W
TOTAL
5984 points/W
7514 points/W

Performance/GHz
i9-11900K
i7-1165G7
Test#1 (Integers)
6807 points/GHz
4887 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5695 points/GHz
4599 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2446 points/GHz
1912 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
4129 points/GHz
1813 points/GHz
TOTAL
19077 points/GHz
13212 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4