Core i9-11900H vs Xeon E5-2680 v3
Description
The i9-11900H is based on Tiger Lake architecture while the E5-2680 v3 is based on Haswell.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i9-11900H gets a score of 584.5 k points while the E5-2680 v3 gets 426.6 k points.
Summarizing, the i9-11900H is 1.4 times faster than the E5-2680 v3. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i9-11900H gets a score of 584.5 k points while the E5-2680 v3 gets 426.6 k points.
Summarizing, the i9-11900H is 1.4 times faster than the E5-2680 v3. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
806d1
306f2
Core
Tiger Lake-H
Haswell-EP
Base frecuency
2.5 GHz
2.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.9 GHz
3.3 GHz
Socket
BGA 1787
LGA 2011-3
Cores/Threads
8/16
12/24
TDP
45 W
120 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x48 kB
12x32+12x32 kB
Cache L2
8x1280 kB
12x256 kB
Cache L3
24576 kB
30720 kB
Date
May 2021
September 2014
Mean monothread perf.
89.19k points
36.31k points
Mean multithread perf.
584.47k points
426.58k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i9-11900H
E5-2680 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
33.38k
18.86k (x0.57)
Test#2 (FP)
27.12k
10.06k (x0.37)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
11.69k
4.14k (x0.35)
Test#1 (Memory)
17k
3.24k (x0.19)
TOTAL
89.19k
36.31k (x0.41)
Multithread
i9-11900H
E5-2680 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
249.83k
218.93k (x0.88)
Test#2 (FP)
237.26k
139.75k (x0.59)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
84.18k
55.47k (x0.66)
Test#1 (Memory)
13.2k
12.42k (x0.94)
TOTAL
584.47k
426.58k (x0.73)
Performance/W
i9-11900H
E5-2680 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
5552 points/W
1824 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
5272 points/W
1165 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1871 points/W
462 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
293 points/W
103 points/W
TOTAL
12988 points/W
3555 points/W
Performance/GHz
i9-11900H
E5-2680 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
6812 points/GHz
5716 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5535 points/GHz
3049 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2386 points/GHz
1254 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3469 points/GHz
983 points/GHz
TOTAL
18202 points/GHz
11002 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4