Core i9-11900H vs i7-5960X
Description
The i9-11900H is based on Tiger Lake architecture while the i7-5960X is based on Haswell.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i9-11900H gets a score of 584.5 k points while the i7-5960X gets 294.3 k points.
Summarizing, the i9-11900H is 2 times faster than the i7-5960X . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i9-11900H gets a score of 584.5 k points while the i7-5960X gets 294.3 k points.
Summarizing, the i9-11900H is 2 times faster than the i7-5960X . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
806d1
306f2
Core
Tiger Lake-H
Haswell-E
Base frecuency
2.5 GHz
3 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.9 GHz
3.5 GHz
Socket
BGA 1787
LGA 1150
Cores/Threads
8/16
8/16
TDP
45 W
140 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x48 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
8x1280 kB
8x256 kB
Cache L3
24576 kB
20480 kB
Date
May 2021
September 2014
Mean monothread perf.
89.19k points
13.16k points
Mean multithread perf.
584.47k points
294.29k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i9-11900H
i7-5960X
Test#1 (Integers)
33.38k
6.6k (x0.2)
Test#2 (FP)
27.12k
3.8k (x0.14)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
11.69k
1.41k (x0.12)
Test#1 (Memory)
17k
1.34k (x0.08)
TOTAL
89.19k
13.16k (x0.15)
Multithread
i9-11900H
i7-5960X
Test#1 (Integers)
249.83k
146.65k (x0.59)
Test#2 (FP)
237.26k
100.72k (x0.42)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
84.18k
34.09k (x0.4)
Test#1 (Memory)
13.2k
12.83k (x0.97)
TOTAL
584.47k
294.29k (x0.5)
Performance/W
i9-11900H
i7-5960X
Test#1 (Integers)
5552 points/W
1047 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
5272 points/W
719 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1871 points/W
243 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
293 points/W
92 points/W
TOTAL
12988 points/W
2102 points/W
Performance/GHz
i9-11900H
i7-5960X
Test#1 (Integers)
6812 points/GHz
1887 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5535 points/GHz
1086 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2386 points/GHz
403 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3469 points/GHz
384 points/GHz
TOTAL
18202 points/GHz
3759 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4