| | | | | | |

Core i9-11900H vs i9-13980HX


Description
The i9-11900H is based on Tiger Lake architecture while the i9-13980HX is based on Raptor Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i9-11900H gets a score of 584.5 k points while the i9-13980HX gets 1317.5 k points.

Summarizing, the i9-13980HX is 2.3 times faster than the i9-11900H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
806d1
b0671
Core
Tiger Lake-H
Raptor Lake-HX
Architecture
Tiger Lake
Base frecuency
2.5 GHz
2.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.9 GHz
5.6 GHz
Socket
BGA 1787
BGA 1964
Cores/Threads
8/16
24/32
TDP
45 W
55 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x48 kB
8x32/16x64+8x48/16x32 kB
Cache L2
8x1280 kB
8x2048+16x4096 kB
Cache L3
24576 kB
36864 kB
Date
May 2021
January 2023
Mean monothread perf.
89.19k points
116.05k points
Mean multithread perf.
584.47k points
1317.53k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i9-11900H
i9-13980HX
Test#1 (Integers)
33.38k
54.07k (x1.62)
Test#2 (FP)
27.12k
30.22k (x1.11)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
11.69k
15.67k (x1.34)
Test#1 (Memory)
17k
16.09k (x0.95)
TOTAL
89.19k
116.05k (x1.3)

Multithread

i9-11900H

i9-13980HX
Test#1 (Integers)
249.83k
597.18k (x2.39)
Test#2 (FP)
237.26k
466.55k (x1.97)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
84.18k
225.13k (x2.67)
Test#1 (Memory)
13.2k
28.67k (x2.17)
TOTAL
584.47k
1317.53k (x2.25)

Performance/W
i9-11900H
i9-13980HX
Test#1 (Integers)
5552 points/W
10858 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
5272 points/W
8483 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1871 points/W
4093 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
293 points/W
521 points/W
TOTAL
12988 points/W
23955 points/W

Performance/GHz
i9-11900H
i9-13980HX
Test#1 (Integers)
6812 points/GHz
9655 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5535 points/GHz
5396 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2386 points/GHz
2798 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3469 points/GHz
2874 points/GHz
TOTAL
18202 points/GHz
20723 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4