Core i9-11900H vs i5-12400F
Description
The i9-11900H is based on Tiger Lake architecture while the i5-12400F is based on Alder Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i9-11900H gets a score of 584.5 k points while the i5-12400F gets 512.2 k points.
Summarizing, the i9-11900H is 1.1 times faster than the i5-12400F. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i9-11900H gets a score of 584.5 k points while the i5-12400F gets 512.2 k points.
Summarizing, the i9-11900H is 1.1 times faster than the i5-12400F. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
806d1
90672
Core
Tiger Lake-H
Alder Lake-S
Base frecuency
2.5 GHz
2.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.9 GHz
4.4 GHz
Socket
BGA 1787
LGA 1700
Cores/Threads
8/16
6/12
TDP
45 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x48 kB
6x32+6x48 kB
Cache L2
8x1280 kB
6x1280 kB
Cache L3
24576 kB
18432 kB
Date
May 2021
January 2022
Mean monothread perf.
89.19k points
88.01k points
Mean multithread perf.
584.47k points
512.23k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i9-11900H
i5-12400F
Test#1 (Integers)
33.38k
37.79k (x1.13)
Test#2 (FP)
27.12k
24.07k (x0.89)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
11.69k
12.44k (x1.06)
Test#1 (Memory)
17k
13.71k (x0.81)
TOTAL
89.19k
88.01k (x0.99)
Multithread
i9-11900H
i5-12400F
Test#1 (Integers)
249.83k
212.6k (x0.85)
Test#2 (FP)
237.26k
197.81k (x0.83)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
84.18k
84.35k (x1)
Test#1 (Memory)
13.2k
17.48k (x1.32)
TOTAL
584.47k
512.23k (x0.88)
Performance/W
i9-11900H
i5-12400F
Test#1 (Integers)
5552 points/W
3271 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
5272 points/W
3043 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1871 points/W
1298 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
293 points/W
269 points/W
TOTAL
12988 points/W
7881 points/W
Performance/GHz
i9-11900H
i5-12400F
Test#1 (Integers)
6812 points/GHz
8588 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5535 points/GHz
5471 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2386 points/GHz
2827 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3469 points/GHz
3116 points/GHz
TOTAL
18202 points/GHz
20003 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4