| | | | | | |

Core i7-1195G7 vs Xeon Silver 4110


Description
The i7-1195G7 is based on Tiger Lake architecture while the 4110 is based on Skylake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-1195G7 gets a score of 239.6 k points while the 4110 gets 281.5 k points.

Summarizing, the 4110 is 1.2 times faster than the i7-1195G7. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
806c2
50654
Core
Tiger Lake UP3
Skylake-SP
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.9 GHz
2.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
5 GHz
3 GHz
Socket
BGA 1499
LGA3647
Cores/Threads
4/8
8/16
TDP
28 W
85 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x48 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
4x1280 kB
8x1024 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
11264 kB
Date
May 2021
July 2017
Mean monothread perf.
82.77k points
45.82k points
Mean multithread perf.
239.58k points
281.48k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i7-1195G7
4110
Test#1 (Integers)
4.57k
3k (x0.65)
Test#2 (FP)
17.21k
12.29k (x0.71)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.97k
3.64k (x0.36)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.98k
6.55k (x0.44)
TOTAL
46.75k
25.46k (x0.54)

Multithread

i7-1195G7

4110
Test#1 (Integers)
12.75k
20.42k (x1.6)
Test#2 (FP)
45.98k
95.83k (x2.08)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
27.86k
30.88k (x1.11)
Test#1 (Memory)
20.06k
9.7k (x0.48)
TOTAL
106.66k
156.83k (x1.47)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-1195G7
4110
Test#1 (Integers)
30.89k
18.78k (x0.61)
Test#2 (FP)
25.57k
16.25k (x0.64)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.64k
3.99k (x0.37)
Test#1 (Memory)
15.66k
6.8k (x0.43)
TOTAL
82.77k
45.82k (x0.55)

Multithread

i7-1195G7

4110
Test#1 (Integers)
96.34k
133.55k (x1.39)
Test#2 (FP)
95.75k
108.43k (x1.13)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
32.29k
30.02k (x0.93)
Test#1 (Memory)
15.2k
9.48k (x0.62)
TOTAL
239.58k
281.48k (x1.17)

Performance/W
i7-1195G7
4110
Test#1 (Integers)
3441 points/W
1571 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3420 points/W
1276 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1153 points/W
353 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
543 points/W
112 points/W
TOTAL
8557 points/W
3311 points/W

Performance/GHz
i7-1195G7
4110
Test#1 (Integers)
6179 points/GHz
6259 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5115 points/GHz
5417 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2128 points/GHz
1330 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3133 points/GHz
2267 points/GHz
TOTAL
16555 points/GHz
15273 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4