| | | | | | |

Core i7-1195G7 vs i7-11800H (ES)


Description
Both models i7-1195G7 and i7-11800H (ES) are based on Tiger Lake architecture.

It’s the 11th generation of Core CPUs and it’s manufactured in the 10nm SuperFin process.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-1195G7 gets a score of 239.6 k points while the i7-11800H (ES) gets 709.9 k points.

Summarizing, the i7-11800H (ES) is 3 times faster than the i7-1195G7. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
806c2
806d0
Core
Tiger Lake UP3
Tiger Lake-H
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.9 GHz
2.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
5 GHz
4.6 GHz
Socket
BGA 1499
BGA 1787
Cores/Threads
4/8
8/16
TDP
28 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x48 kB
8x32+8x48 kB
Cache L2
4x1280 kB
8x1280 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
24576 kB
Date
May 2021
May 2021
Mean monothread perf.
82.77k points
81.62k points
Mean multithread perf.
239.58k points
709.85k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i7-1195G7
i7-11800H (ES)
Test#1 (Integers)
4.57k
4.4k (x0.96)
Test#2 (FP)
17.21k
20.25k (x1.18)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.97k
11.69k (x1.17)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.98k
11.66k (x0.78)
TOTAL
46.75k
48.01k (x1.03)

Multithread

i7-1195G7

i7-11800H (ES)
Test#1 (Integers)
12.75k
38.93k (x3.05)
Test#2 (FP)
45.98k
191.89k (x4.17)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
27.86k
108.8k (x3.91)
Test#1 (Memory)
20.06k
14.95k (x0.75)
TOTAL
106.66k
354.57k (x3.32)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-1195G7
i7-11800H (ES)
Test#1 (Integers)
30.89k
30.84k (x1)
Test#2 (FP)
25.57k
26.38k (x1.03)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.64k
12.66k (x1.19)
Test#1 (Memory)
15.66k
11.74k (x0.75)
TOTAL
82.77k
81.62k (x0.99)

Multithread

i7-1195G7

i7-11800H (ES)
Test#1 (Integers)
96.34k
294.86k (x3.06)
Test#2 (FP)
95.75k
280.92k (x2.93)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
32.29k
113.9k (x3.53)
Test#1 (Memory)
15.2k
20.16k (x1.33)
TOTAL
239.58k
709.85k (x2.96)

Performance/W
i7-1195G7
i7-11800H (ES)
Test#1 (Integers)
3441 points/W
6553 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3420 points/W
6243 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1153 points/W
2531 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
543 points/W
448 points/W
TOTAL
8557 points/W
15774 points/W

Performance/GHz
i7-1195G7
i7-11800H (ES)
Test#1 (Integers)
6179 points/GHz
6705 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5115 points/GHz
5734 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2128 points/GHz
2752 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3133 points/GHz
2552 points/GHz
TOTAL
16555 points/GHz
17744 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4