Core i7-1195G7 vs Ryzen 9 5900X
Description
The i7-1195G7 is based on Tiger Lake architecture while the 5900X is based on Zen 3.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-1195G7 gets a score of 239.6 k points while the 5900X gets 814.7 k points.
Summarizing, the 5900X is 3.4 times faster than the i7-1195G7. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-1195G7 gets a score of 239.6 k points while the 5900X gets 814.7 k points.
Summarizing, the 5900X is 3.4 times faster than the i7-1195G7. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
806c2
a20f12
Core
Tiger Lake UP3
Vermeer
Base frecuency
2.9 GHz
3.7 GHz
Boost frecuency
5 GHz
4.8 GHz
Socket
BGA 1499
AM4
Cores/Threads
4/8
12/24
TDP
28 W
105 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x48 kB
12x32+12x32 kB
Cache L2
4x1280 kB
12x512 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
2x32768 kB
Date
May 2021
November 2020
Mean monothread perf.
82.77k points
83.5k points
Mean multithread perf.
239.58k points
814.74k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-1195G7
5900X
Test#1 (Integers)
30.89k
22.6k (x0.73)
Test#2 (FP)
25.57k
24.85k (x0.97)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.64k
11.25k (x1.06)
Test#1 (Memory)
15.66k
24.8k (x1.58)
TOTAL
82.77k
83.5k (x1.01)
Multithread
i7-1195G7
5900X
Test#1 (Integers)
96.34k
258.21k (x2.68)
Test#2 (FP)
95.75k
342.24k (x3.57)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
32.29k
155.3k (x4.81)
Test#1 (Memory)
15.2k
59k (x3.88)
TOTAL
239.58k
814.74k (x3.4)
Performance/W
i7-1195G7
5900X
Test#1 (Integers)
3441 points/W
2459 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3420 points/W
3259 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1153 points/W
1479 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
543 points/W
562 points/W
TOTAL
8557 points/W
7759 points/W
Performance/GHz
i7-1195G7
5900X
Test#1 (Integers)
6179 points/GHz
4709 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5115 points/GHz
5177 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2128 points/GHz
2343 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3133 points/GHz
5167 points/GHz
TOTAL
16555 points/GHz
17396 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4