| | | | | | |

Core i7-1195G7 vs Ryzen 5 3580U Microsoft Surface (R) Edition


Description
The i7-1195G7 is based on Tiger Lake architecture while the 3580U Microsoft Surface (R) Edition is based on Zen+.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-1195G7 gets a score of 239.6 k points while the 3580U Microsoft Surface (R) Edition gets 174.2 k points.

Summarizing, the i7-1195G7 is 1.4 times faster than the 3580U Microsoft Surface (R) Edition. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
806c2
810f81
Core
Tiger Lake UP3
Picasso
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.9 GHz
2.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
5 GHz
3.7 GHz
Socket
BGA 1499
BGA-FP5
Cores/Threads
4/8
4/8
TDP
28 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x48 kB
4x64+4x32 kB
Cache L2
4x1280 kB
4x512 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
4096 kB
Date
May 2021
October 2019
Mean monothread perf.
82.77k points
45.3k points
Mean multithread perf.
239.58k points
174.19k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-1195G7
3580U Microsoft Surface (R) Edition
Test#1 (Integers)
30.89k
13.77k (x0.45)
Test#2 (FP)
25.57k
22.62k (x0.88)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.64k
4.91k (x0.46)
Test#1 (Memory)
15.66k
4k (x0.26)
TOTAL
82.77k
45.3k (x0.55)

Multithread

i7-1195G7

3580U Microsoft Surface (R) Edition
Test#1 (Integers)
96.34k
50.44k (x0.52)
Test#2 (FP)
95.75k
94k (x0.98)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
32.29k
25.64k (x0.79)
Test#1 (Memory)
15.2k
4.11k (x0.27)
TOTAL
239.58k
174.19k (x0.73)

Performance/W
i7-1195G7
3580U Microsoft Surface (R) Edition
Test#1 (Integers)
3441 points/W
3363 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3420 points/W
6267 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1153 points/W
1710 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
543 points/W
274 points/W
TOTAL
8557 points/W
11613 points/W

Performance/GHz
i7-1195G7
3580U Microsoft Surface (R) Edition
Test#1 (Integers)
6179 points/GHz
3722 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5115 points/GHz
6113 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2128 points/GHz
1326 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3133 points/GHz
1082 points/GHz
TOTAL
16555 points/GHz
12243 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4