Core i7-1195G7 vs Ryzen 5 2600X
Description
The i7-1195G7 is based on Tiger Lake architecture while the 2600X is based on Zen+.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-1195G7 gets a score of 239.6 k points while the 2600X gets 333.1 k points.
Summarizing, the 2600X is 1.4 times faster than the i7-1195G7. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-1195G7 gets a score of 239.6 k points while the 2600X gets 333.1 k points.
Summarizing, the 2600X is 1.4 times faster than the i7-1195G7. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
806c2
800f82
Core
Tiger Lake UP3
Pinnacle Ridge
Base frecuency
2.9 GHz
3.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
5 GHz
4.2 GHz
Socket
BGA 1499
AM4
Cores/Threads
4/8
6/12
TDP
28 W
95 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x48 kB
6x64+6x32 kB
Cache L2
4x1280 kB
6x512 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
2x8192 kB
Date
May 2021
April 2018
Mean monothread perf.
82.77k points
66.44k points
Mean multithread perf.
239.58k points
333.12k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-1195G7
2600X
Test#1 (Integers)
30.89k
15.75k (x0.51)
Test#2 (FP)
25.57k
26.29k (x1.03)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.64k
5.91k (x0.56)
Test#1 (Memory)
15.66k
18.48k (x1.18)
TOTAL
82.77k
66.44k (x0.8)
Multithread
i7-1195G7
2600X
Test#1 (Integers)
96.34k
94.49k (x0.98)
Test#2 (FP)
95.75k
182.53k (x1.91)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
32.29k
45.95k (x1.42)
Test#1 (Memory)
15.2k
10.15k (x0.67)
TOTAL
239.58k
333.12k (x1.39)
Performance/W
i7-1195G7
2600X
Test#1 (Integers)
3441 points/W
995 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3420 points/W
1921 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1153 points/W
484 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
543 points/W
107 points/W
TOTAL
8557 points/W
3507 points/W
Performance/GHz
i7-1195G7
2600X
Test#1 (Integers)
6179 points/GHz
3749 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5115 points/GHz
6261 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2128 points/GHz
1408 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3133 points/GHz
4401 points/GHz
TOTAL
16555 points/GHz
15819 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4