Core i7-11800H vs i9-10900K
Description
The i7-11800H is based on Tiger Lake architecture while the i9-10900K is based on Comet Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-11800H gets a score of 607.4 k points while the i9-10900K gets 685.6 k points.
Summarizing, the i9-10900K is 1.1 times faster than the i7-11800H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-11800H gets a score of 607.4 k points while the i9-10900K gets 685.6 k points.
Summarizing, the i9-10900K is 1.1 times faster than the i7-11800H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
806d1
a0655
Core
Tiger Lake-H
Comet Lake-S
Base frecuency
2.3 GHz
3.7 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.6 GHz
5.2 GHz
Socket
BGA 1787
LGA 1200
Cores/Threads
8/16
10/20
TDP
45 W
125 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x48 kB
10x32+10x32 kB
Cache L2
8x1280 kB
10x256 kB
Cache L3
24576 kB
20480 kB
Date
May 2021
April 2020
Mean monothread perf.
88.34k points
80.41k points
Mean multithread perf.
607.38k points
685.65k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-11800H
i9-10900K
Test#1 (Integers)
33.02k
32.67k (x0.99)
Test#2 (FP)
26.55k
28.49k (x1.07)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
11.72k
6.53k (x0.56)
Test#1 (Memory)
17.06k
12.72k (x0.75)
TOTAL
88.34k
80.41k (x0.91)
Multithread
i7-11800H
i9-10900K
Test#1 (Integers)
260.97k
307.39k (x1.18)
Test#2 (FP)
248.94k
298.47k (x1.2)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
86.55k
72.94k (x0.84)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.91k
6.85k (x0.63)
TOTAL
607.38k
685.65k (x1.13)
Performance/W
i7-11800H
i9-10900K
Test#1 (Integers)
5799 points/W
2459 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
5532 points/W
2388 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1923 points/W
583 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
242 points/W
55 points/W
TOTAL
13497 points/W
5485 points/W
Performance/GHz
i7-11800H
i9-10900K
Test#1 (Integers)
7177 points/GHz
6282 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5771 points/GHz
5479 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2547 points/GHz
1257 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3709 points/GHz
2445 points/GHz
TOTAL
19204 points/GHz
15463 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4