| | | | | | |

Core i7-11800H vs Ryzen Z1 Extreme


Description
The i7-11800H is based on Tiger Lake architecture while the Z1 Extreme is based on Zen 4.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-11800H gets a score of 607.4 k points while the Z1 Extreme gets 553.4 k points.

Summarizing, the i7-11800H is 1.1 times faster than the Z1 Extreme. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
806d1
a70f41
Core
Tiger Lake-H
Phoenix
Architecture
Tiger Lake
Base frecuency
2.3 GHz
3.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.6 GHz
5.1 GHz
Socket
BGA 1787
BGA
Cores/Threads
8/16
8/16
TDP
45 W
30 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x48 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
8x1280 kB
8x1024 kB
Cache L3
24576 kB
16384 kB
Date
May 2021
June 2023
Mean monothread perf.
88.34k points
101.73k points
Mean multithread perf.
607.38k points
553.41k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-11800H
Z1 Extreme
Test#1 (Integers)
33.02k
32.74k (x0.99)
Test#2 (FP)
26.55k
27.35k (x1.03)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
11.72k
14.23k (x1.21)
Test#1 (Memory)
17.06k
27.41k (x1.61)
TOTAL
88.34k
101.73k (x1.15)

Multithread

i7-11800H

Z1 Extreme
Test#1 (Integers)
260.97k
236.69k (x0.91)
Test#2 (FP)
248.94k
202.63k (x0.81)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
86.55k
102.8k (x1.19)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.91k
11.28k (x1.03)
TOTAL
607.38k
553.41k (x0.91)

Performance/W
i7-11800H
Z1 Extreme
Test#1 (Integers)
5799 points/W
7890 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
5532 points/W
6754 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1923 points/W
3427 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
242 points/W
376 points/W
TOTAL
13497 points/W
18447 points/W

Performance/GHz
i7-11800H
Z1 Extreme
Test#1 (Integers)
7177 points/GHz
6419 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5771 points/GHz
5363 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2547 points/GHz
2789 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3709 points/GHz
5375 points/GHz
TOTAL
19204 points/GHz
19946 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4