| | | | | | |

Core i7-11800H vs i7-13700T


Description
The i7-11800H is based on Tiger Lake architecture while the i7-13700T is based on Raptor Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-11800H gets a score of 607.4 k points while the i7-13700T gets 951.3 k points.

Summarizing, the i7-13700T is 1.6 times faster than the i7-11800H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
806d1
b0671
Core
Tiger Lake-H
Raptor Lake-S
Architecture
Tiger Lake
Base frecuency
2.3 GHz
1.4 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.6 GHz
4.9 GHz
Socket
BGA 1787
LGA 1700
Cores/Threads
8/16
16/24
TDP
45 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x48 kB
8x32/8x64+8x48/8x32 kB
Cache L2
8x1280 kB
8x2048/2x4096 kB
Cache L3
24576 kB
30720 kB
Date
May 2021
January 2023
Mean monothread perf.
88.34k points
107.15k points
Mean multithread perf.
607.38k points
951.3k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-11800H
i7-13700T
Test#1 (Integers)
33.02k
46.53k (x1.41)
Test#2 (FP)
26.55k
28.48k (x1.07)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
11.72k
15.08k (x1.29)
Test#1 (Memory)
17.06k
17.07k (x1)
TOTAL
88.34k
107.15k (x1.21)

Multithread

i7-11800H

i7-13700T
Test#1 (Integers)
260.97k
443.98k (x1.7)
Test#2 (FP)
248.94k
343.34k (x1.38)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
86.55k
147.61k (x1.71)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.91k
16.36k (x1.5)
TOTAL
607.38k
951.3k (x1.57)

Performance/W
i7-11800H
i7-13700T
Test#1 (Integers)
5799 points/W
12685 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
5532 points/W
9810 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1923 points/W
4217 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
242 points/W
468 points/W
TOTAL
13497 points/W
27180 points/W

Performance/GHz
i7-11800H
i7-13700T
Test#1 (Integers)
7177 points/GHz
9496 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5771 points/GHz
5812 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2547 points/GHz
3077 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3709 points/GHz
3483 points/GHz
TOTAL
19204 points/GHz
21868 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4