| | | | | | |

Core i7-11800H vs i5-13400


Description
The i7-11800H is based on Tiger Lake architecture while the i5-13400 is based on Raptor Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-11800H gets a score of 607.4 k points while the i5-13400 gets 497.8 k points.

Summarizing, the i7-11800H is 1.2 times faster than the i5-13400. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
806d1
b06f2
Core
Tiger Lake-H
Raptor Lake-S
Architecture
Tiger Lake
Base frecuency
2.3 GHz
2.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.6 GHz
4.6 GHz
Socket
BGA 1787
LGA 1700
Cores/Threads
8/16
10/16
TDP
45 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x48 kB
6x32/4x64+6x48/4x32 kB
Cache L2
8x1280 kB
6x2048+4x4096 kB
Cache L3
24576 kB
20480 kB
Date
May 2021
January 2023
Mean monothread perf.
88.34k points
100.11k points
Mean multithread perf.
607.38k points
497.83k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-11800H
i5-13400
Test#1 (Integers)
33.02k
47.01k (x1.42)
Test#2 (FP)
26.55k
26.73k (x1.01)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
11.72k
14.28k (x1.22)
Test#1 (Memory)
17.06k
12.1k (x0.71)
TOTAL
88.34k
100.11k (x1.13)

Multithread

i7-11800H

i5-13400
Test#1 (Integers)
260.97k
228.2k (x0.87)
Test#2 (FP)
248.94k
160.28k (x0.64)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
86.55k
71.12k (x0.82)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.91k
38.23k (x3.5)
TOTAL
607.38k
497.83k (x0.82)

Performance/W
i7-11800H
i5-13400
Test#1 (Integers)
5799 points/W
3511 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
5532 points/W
2466 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1923 points/W
1094 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
242 points/W
588 points/W
TOTAL
13497 points/W
7659 points/W

Performance/GHz
i7-11800H
i5-13400
Test#1 (Integers)
7177 points/GHz
10219 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5771 points/GHz
5811 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2547 points/GHz
3103 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3709 points/GHz
2630 points/GHz
TOTAL
19204 points/GHz
21763 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4