| | | | | | |

Core i7-11800H vs i5-12400F


Description
The i7-11800H is based on Tiger Lake architecture while the i5-12400F is based on Alder Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-11800H gets a score of 607.4 k points while the i5-12400F gets 399.4 k points.

Summarizing, the i7-11800H is 1.5 times faster than the i5-12400F. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
806d1
90675
Core
Tiger Lake-H
Alder Lake-S
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.3 GHz
2.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.6 GHz
4.4 GHz
Socket
BGA 1787
LGA 1700
Cores/Threads
8/16
6/12
TDP
45 W
117 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x48 kB
6x32/0x64+6x48/0x32 kB
Cache L2
8x1280 kB
6x1280+0x2048 kB
Cache L3
24576 kB
18432 kB
Date
May 2021
January 2022
Mean monothread perf.
88.34k points
76.46k points
Mean multithread perf.
607.38k points
399.39k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-11800H
i5-12400F
Test#1 (Integers)
33.02k
33.85k (x1.03)
Test#2 (FP)
26.55k
20.33k (x0.77)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
11.72k
10.51k (x0.9)
Test#1 (Memory)
17.06k
11.77k (x0.69)
TOTAL
88.34k
76.46k (x0.87)

Multithread

i7-11800H

i5-12400F
Test#1 (Integers)
260.97k
174.21k (x0.67)
Test#2 (FP)
248.94k
141.31k (x0.57)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
86.55k
64.86k (x0.75)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.91k
19.01k (x1.74)
TOTAL
607.38k
399.39k (x0.66)

Performance/W
i7-11800H
i5-12400F
Test#1 (Integers)
5799 points/W
1489 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
5532 points/W
1208 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1923 points/W
554 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
242 points/W
162 points/W
TOTAL
13497 points/W
3414 points/W

Performance/GHz
i7-11800H
i5-12400F
Test#1 (Integers)
7177 points/GHz
7693 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5771 points/GHz
4621 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2547 points/GHz
2389 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3709 points/GHz
2675 points/GHz
TOTAL
19204 points/GHz
17378 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4