Core i7-11800H vs i5-12400F
Description
The i7-11800H is based on Tiger Lake architecture while the i5-12400F is based on Alder Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-11800H gets a score of 607.4 k points while the i5-12400F gets 512.2 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-11800H is 1.2 times faster than the i5-12400F. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-11800H gets a score of 607.4 k points while the i5-12400F gets 512.2 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-11800H is 1.2 times faster than the i5-12400F. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
806d1
90672
Core
Tiger Lake-H
Alder Lake-S
Base frecuency
2.3 GHz
2.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.6 GHz
4.4 GHz
Socket
BGA 1787
LGA 1700
Cores/Threads
8/16
6/12
TDP
45 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x48 kB
6x32+6x48 kB
Cache L2
8x1280 kB
6x1280 kB
Cache L3
24576 kB
18432 kB
Date
May 2021
January 2022
Mean monothread perf.
88.34k points
88.01k points
Mean multithread perf.
607.38k points
512.23k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-11800H
i5-12400F
Test#1 (Integers)
33.02k
37.79k (x1.14)
Test#2 (FP)
26.55k
24.07k (x0.91)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
11.72k
12.44k (x1.06)
Test#1 (Memory)
17.06k
13.71k (x0.8)
TOTAL
88.34k
88.01k (x1)
Multithread
i7-11800H
i5-12400F
Test#1 (Integers)
260.97k
212.6k (x0.81)
Test#2 (FP)
248.94k
197.81k (x0.79)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
86.55k
84.35k (x0.97)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.91k
17.48k (x1.6)
TOTAL
607.38k
512.23k (x0.84)
Performance/W
i7-11800H
i5-12400F
Test#1 (Integers)
5799 points/W
3271 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
5532 points/W
3043 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1923 points/W
1298 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
242 points/W
269 points/W
TOTAL
13497 points/W
7881 points/W
Performance/GHz
i7-11800H
i5-12400F
Test#1 (Integers)
7177 points/GHz
8588 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5771 points/GHz
5471 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2547 points/GHz
2827 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3709 points/GHz
3116 points/GHz
TOTAL
19204 points/GHz
20003 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4