Core i7-11700F vs N100
Description
The i7-11700F is based on Rocket Lake architecture while the is based on Alder Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-11700F gets a score of 512.3 k points while the gets 88.3 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-11700F is 5.8 times faster than the . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-11700F gets a score of 512.3 k points while the gets 88.3 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-11700F is 5.8 times faster than the . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
a0671
b06e0
Core
Rocket Lake-S
Alder Lake-N
Base frecuency
2.5 GHz
0.8 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.9 GHz
3.4 GHz
Socket
LGA 1200
BGA 1264
Cores/Threads
8/16
4/4
TDP
65 W
6 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x48 kB
4x64+4x32 kB
Cache L2
8x512 kB
2048 kB
Cache L3
16384 kB
6144 kB
Date
March 2021
January 2023
Mean monothread perf.
89.58k points
36.79k points
Mean multithread perf.
512.32k points
88.29k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-11700F
Test#1 (Integers)
32.55k
15.23k (x0.47)
Test#2 (FP)
26.95k
11.04k (x0.41)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.76k
5.54k (x0.52)
Test#1 (Memory)
19.32k
4.98k (x0.26)
TOTAL
89.58k
36.79k (x0.41)
Multithread
i7-11700F
Test#1 (Integers)
232.06k
37.07k (x0.16)
Test#2 (FP)
203.56k
32.57k (x0.16)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
72.89k
14.75k (x0.2)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.81k
3.9k (x1.02)
TOTAL
512.32k
88.29k (x0.17)
Performance/W
i7-11700F
Test#1 (Integers)
3570 points/W
6178 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3132 points/W
5429 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1121 points/W
2459 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
59 points/W
649 points/W
TOTAL
7882 points/W
14715 points/W
Performance/GHz
i7-11700F
Test#1 (Integers)
6642 points/GHz
4479 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5500 points/GHz
3247 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2196 points/GHz
1631 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3943 points/GHz
1464 points/GHz
TOTAL
18281 points/GHz
10821 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4