| | | | | | |

Core i7-11700F vs i7-10870H


Description
The i7-11700F is based on Rocket Lake architecture while the i7-10870H is based on Comet Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-11700F gets a score of 512.3 k points while the i7-10870H gets 487 k points.

Summarizing, the i7-11700F is 1.1 times faster than the i7-10870H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
a0671
a0652
Core
Rocket Lake-S
Comet Lake-H
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.5 GHz
2.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.9 GHz
5 GHz
Socket
LGA 1200
FC-BGA 1440
Cores/Threads
8/16
8/16
TDP
65 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x48 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
8x512 kB
8x256 kB
Cache L3
16384 kB
16384 kB
Date
March 2021
September 2020
Mean monothread perf.
89.58k points
79.2k points
Mean multithread perf.
512.32k points
487.05k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-11700F
i7-10870H
Test#1 (Integers)
32.55k
30.38k (x0.93)
Test#2 (FP)
26.95k
27.95k (x1.04)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.76k
6.51k (x0.61)
Test#1 (Memory)
19.32k
14.37k (x0.74)
TOTAL
89.58k
79.2k (x0.88)

Multithread

i7-11700F

i7-10870H
Test#1 (Integers)
232.06k
216.18k (x0.93)
Test#2 (FP)
203.56k
210.82k (x1.04)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
72.89k
51.57k (x0.71)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.81k
8.47k (x2.22)
TOTAL
512.32k
487.05k (x0.95)

Performance/W
i7-11700F
i7-10870H
Test#1 (Integers)
3570 points/W
4804 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3132 points/W
4685 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1121 points/W
1146 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
59 points/W
188 points/W
TOTAL
7882 points/W
10823 points/W

Performance/GHz
i7-11700F
i7-10870H
Test#1 (Integers)
6642 points/GHz
6075 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5500 points/GHz
5589 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2196 points/GHz
1302 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3943 points/GHz
2873 points/GHz
TOTAL
18281 points/GHz
15840 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4