| | | | | | |

Core i7-11700F vs i3-10100T


Description
The i7-11700F is based on Rocket Lake architecture while the i3-10100T is based on Comet Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-11700F gets a score of 512.3 k points while the i3-10100T gets 227.7 k points.

Summarizing, the i7-11700F is 2.2 times faster than the i3-10100T. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
a0671
a0653
Core
Rocket Lake-S
Comet Lake-S
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.5 GHz
3.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.9 GHz
4.3 GHz
Socket
LGA 1200
FC-LGA 1200
Cores/Threads
8/16
4/8
TDP
65 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x48 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
8x512 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
16384 kB
6144 kB
Date
March 2021
April 2020
Mean monothread perf.
89.58k points
60.06k points
Mean multithread perf.
512.32k points
227.67k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-11700F
i3-10100T
Test#1 (Integers)
32.55k
24.31k (x0.75)
Test#2 (FP)
26.95k
22.15k (x0.82)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.76k
5.14k (x0.48)
Test#1 (Memory)
19.32k
8.46k (x0.44)
TOTAL
89.58k
60.06k (x0.67)

Multithread

i7-11700F

i3-10100T
Test#1 (Integers)
232.06k
101.48k (x0.44)
Test#2 (FP)
203.56k
98.04k (x0.48)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
72.89k
24.28k (x0.33)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.81k
3.86k (x1.01)
TOTAL
512.32k
227.67k (x0.44)

Performance/W
i7-11700F
i3-10100T
Test#1 (Integers)
3570 points/W
1561 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3132 points/W
1508 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1121 points/W
374 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
59 points/W
59 points/W
TOTAL
7882 points/W
3503 points/W

Performance/GHz
i7-11700F
i3-10100T
Test#1 (Integers)
6642 points/GHz
5653 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5500 points/GHz
5150 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2196 points/GHz
1196 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3943 points/GHz
1967 points/GHz
TOTAL
18281 points/GHz
13967 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4