| | | | | | |

Core i7-11700F vs i9-13900KS


Description
The i7-11700F is based on Rocket Lake architecture while the i9-13900KS is based on Raptor Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-11700F gets a score of 512.3 k points while the i9-13900KS gets 1708.6 k points.

Summarizing, the i9-13900KS is 3.3 times faster than the i7-11700F. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
a0671
b0671
Core
Rocket Lake-S
Raptor Lake-S
Architecture
Rocket Lake
Base frecuency
2.5 GHz
3.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.9 GHz
6 GHz
Socket
LGA 1200
LGA 1700
Cores/Threads
8/16
24/32
TDP
65 W
150 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x48 kB
8x32/16x64+8x48/16x32 kB
Cache L2
8x512 kB
8x2048/4x4096 kB
Cache L3
16384 kB
36864 kB
Date
March 2021
January 2023
Mean monothread perf.
89.58k points
127.35k points
Mean multithread perf.
512.32k points
1708.56k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-11700F
i9-13900KS
Test#1 (Integers)
32.55k
57.69k (x1.77)
Test#2 (FP)
26.95k
33.34k (x1.24)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.76k
17.55k (x1.63)
Test#1 (Memory)
19.32k
18.76k (x0.97)
TOTAL
89.58k
127.35k (x1.42)

Multithread

i7-11700F

i9-13900KS
Test#1 (Integers)
232.06k
757.76k (x3.27)
Test#2 (FP)
203.56k
626.83k (x3.08)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
72.89k
294.93k (x4.05)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.81k
29.05k (x7.63)
TOTAL
512.32k
1708.56k (x3.33)

Performance/W
i7-11700F
i9-13900KS
Test#1 (Integers)
3570 points/W
5052 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3132 points/W
4179 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1121 points/W
1966 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
59 points/W
194 points/W
TOTAL
7882 points/W
11390 points/W

Performance/GHz
i7-11700F
i9-13900KS
Test#1 (Integers)
6642 points/GHz
9616 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5500 points/GHz
5557 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2196 points/GHz
2925 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3943 points/GHz
3127 points/GHz
TOTAL
18281 points/GHz
21226 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4