| | | | | | |

Core i7-11700F vs i7-1280P


Description
The i7-11700F is based on Rocket Lake architecture while the i7-1280P is based on Alder Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-11700F gets a score of 512.3 k points while the i7-1280P gets 468.3 k points.

Summarizing, the i7-11700F is 1.1 times faster than the i7-1280P. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
a0671
906a3
Core
Rocket Lake-S
Alder Lake-P
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.5 GHz
1.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.9 GHz
4.8 GHz
Socket
LGA 1200
BGA 1744
Cores/Threads
8/16
14/20
TDP
65 W
28 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x48 kB
6x32/8x64+6x48/8x32 kB
Cache L2
8x512 kB
6x1280+6x2048 kB
Cache L3
16384 kB
24576 kB
Date
March 2021
April 2022
Mean monothread perf.
89.58k points
91.45k points
Mean multithread perf.
512.32k points
468.3k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-11700F
i7-1280P
Test#1 (Integers)
32.55k
39.78k (x1.22)
Test#2 (FP)
26.95k
26.06k (x0.97)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.76k
12.44k (x1.16)
Test#1 (Memory)
19.32k
13.17k (x0.68)
TOTAL
89.58k
91.45k (x1.02)

Multithread

i7-11700F

i7-1280P
Test#1 (Integers)
232.06k
209.96k (x0.9)
Test#2 (FP)
203.56k
170.21k (x0.84)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
72.89k
72.04k (x0.99)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.81k
16.09k (x4.22)
TOTAL
512.32k
468.3k (x0.91)

Performance/W
i7-11700F
i7-1280P
Test#1 (Integers)
3570 points/W
7499 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3132 points/W
6079 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1121 points/W
2573 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
59 points/W
575 points/W
TOTAL
7882 points/W
16725 points/W

Performance/GHz
i7-11700F
i7-1280P
Test#1 (Integers)
6642 points/GHz
8287 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5500 points/GHz
5429 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2196 points/GHz
2592 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3943 points/GHz
2744 points/GHz
TOTAL
18281 points/GHz
19051 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4