| | | | | | |

Core i7-11700 vs i5-10300H


Description
The i7-11700 is based on Rocket Lake architecture while the i5-10300H is based on Comet Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-11700 gets a score of 729 k points while the i5-10300H gets 246.1 k points.

Summarizing, the i7-11700 is 3 times faster than the i5-10300H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
a0671
a0652
Core
Rocket Lake-S
Comet Lake-H
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.5 GHz
2.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.9 GHz
4.5 GHz
Socket
LGA 1200
BGA 1440
Cores/Threads
8/16
4/8
TDP
65 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x48 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
8x512 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
16384 kB
8192 kB
Date
March 2021
April 2020
Mean monothread perf.
98.87k points
69.47k points
Mean multithread perf.
728.98k points
246.07k points

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i7-11700
i5-10300H
Test#1 (Integers)
18.96k
15.65k (x0.83)
Test#2 (FP)
28.34k
23.13k (x0.82)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
13.26k
5.66k (x0.43)
Test#1 (Memory)
20.2k
11.43k (x0.57)
TOTAL
80.76k
55.87k (x0.69)

Multithread

i7-11700

i5-10300H
Test#1 (Integers)
164.31k
26.77k (x0.16)
Test#2 (FP)
253.96k
43.81k (x0.17)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
115.28k
10.17k (x0.09)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.65k
11.91k (x1.12)
TOTAL
544.2k
92.66k (x0.17)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-11700
i5-10300H
Test#1 (Integers)
35.12k
27.14k (x0.77)
Test#2 (FP)
29.24k
24.75k (x0.85)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
12.56k
5.73k (x0.46)
Test#1 (Memory)
21.95k
11.84k (x0.54)
TOTAL
98.87k
69.47k (x0.7)

Multithread

i7-11700

i5-10300H
Test#1 (Integers)
304k
105.77k (x0.35)
Test#2 (FP)
304.7k
107.47k (x0.35)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
109.64k
24.82k (x0.23)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.64k
8.02k (x0.75)
TOTAL
728.98k
246.07k (x0.34)

Performance/W
i7-11700
i5-10300H
Test#1 (Integers)
4677 points/W
2350 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
4688 points/W
2388 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1687 points/W
552 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
164 points/W
178 points/W
TOTAL
11215 points/W
5468 points/W

Performance/GHz
i7-11700
i5-10300H
Test#1 (Integers)
7168 points/GHz
6031 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5967 points/GHz
5500 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2563 points/GHz
1274 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
4479 points/GHz
2632 points/GHz
TOTAL
20177 points/GHz
15437 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4