| | | | | | |

Core i7-11700 vs Ryzen 5 5600G


Description
The i7-11700 is based on Rocket Lake architecture while the 5600G is based on Zen 3.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-11700 gets a score of 729 k points while the 5600G gets 345.6 k points.

Summarizing, the i7-11700 is 2.1 times faster than the 5600G. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
a0671
a50f00
Core
Rocket Lake-S
Cezanne
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.5 GHz
3.9 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.9 GHz
4.4 GHz
Socket
LGA 1200
AM4
Cores/Threads
8/16
6/12
TDP
65 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x48 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
8x512 kB
6x512 kB
Cache L3
16384 kB
16384 kB
Date
March 2021
April 2021
Mean monothread perf.
98.87k points
79.76k points
Mean multithread perf.
728.98k points
345.64k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-11700
5600G
Test#1 (Integers)
35.12k
22.16k (x0.63)
Test#2 (FP)
29.24k
24.46k (x0.84)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
12.56k
10.71k (x0.85)
Test#1 (Memory)
21.95k
22.44k (x1.02)
TOTAL
98.87k
79.76k (x0.81)

Multithread

i7-11700

5600G
Test#1 (Integers)
304k
112.5k (x0.37)
Test#2 (FP)
304.7k
153.92k (x0.51)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
109.64k
67.75k (x0.62)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.64k
11.47k (x1.08)
TOTAL
728.98k
345.64k (x0.47)

Performance/W
i7-11700
5600G
Test#1 (Integers)
4677 points/W
1731 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
4688 points/W
2368 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1687 points/W
1042 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
164 points/W
177 points/W
TOTAL
11215 points/W
5318 points/W

Performance/GHz
i7-11700
5600G
Test#1 (Integers)
7168 points/GHz
5036 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5967 points/GHz
5558 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2563 points/GHz
2434 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
4479 points/GHz
5099 points/GHz
TOTAL
20177 points/GHz
18128 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4