Core i7-11700 vs i9-11900H
Description
The i7-11700 is based on Rocket Lake architecture while the i9-11900H is based on Tiger Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-11700 gets a score of 729 k points while the i9-11900H gets 584.5 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-11700 is 1.2 times faster than the i9-11900H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-11700 gets a score of 729 k points while the i9-11900H gets 584.5 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-11700 is 1.2 times faster than the i9-11900H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
a0671
806d1
Core
Rocket Lake-S
Tiger Lake-H
Base frecuency
2.5 GHz
2.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.9 GHz
4.9 GHz
Socket
LGA 1200
BGA 1787
Cores/Threads
8/16
8/16
TDP
65 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x48 kB
8x32+8x48 kB
Cache L2
8x512 kB
8x1280 kB
Cache L3
16384 kB
24576 kB
Date
March 2021
May 2021
Mean monothread perf.
98.87k points
89.19k points
Mean multithread perf.
728.98k points
584.47k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-11700
i9-11900H
Test#1 (Integers)
35.12k
33.38k (x0.95)
Test#2 (FP)
29.24k
27.12k (x0.93)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
12.56k
11.69k (x0.93)
Test#1 (Memory)
21.95k
17k (x0.77)
TOTAL
98.87k
89.19k (x0.9)
Multithread
i7-11700
i9-11900H
Test#1 (Integers)
304k
249.83k (x0.82)
Test#2 (FP)
304.7k
237.26k (x0.78)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
109.64k
84.18k (x0.77)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.64k
13.2k (x1.24)
TOTAL
728.98k
584.47k (x0.8)
Performance/W
i7-11700
i9-11900H
Test#1 (Integers)
4677 points/W
5552 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
4688 points/W
5272 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1687 points/W
1871 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
164 points/W
293 points/W
TOTAL
11215 points/W
12988 points/W
Performance/GHz
i7-11700
i9-11900H
Test#1 (Integers)
7168 points/GHz
6812 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5967 points/GHz
5535 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2563 points/GHz
2386 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
4479 points/GHz
3469 points/GHz
TOTAL
20177 points/GHz
18202 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4