| | | | | | |

Core i7-1165G7 vs Xeon E5-2680 v2


Description
The i7-1165G7 is based on Tiger Lake architecture while the E5-2680 v2 is based on Ivy Bridge.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-1165G7 gets a score of 190.1 k points while the E5-2680 v2 gets 551.1 k points.

Summarizing, the E5-2680 v2 is 2.9 times faster than the i7-1165G7. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
806c1
306e4
Core
Tiger Lake-UP3
Ivy Bridge-EP
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.8 GHz
2.8 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.7 GHz
3.6 GHz
Socket
BGA 1449
LGA 2011
Cores/Threads
4/8
10 /20
TDP
28 W
115 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x48 kB
10x32+10x32 kB
Cache L2
4x1280 kB
10x256 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
25600 kB
Date
September 2020
September 2013
Mean monothread perf.
62.1k points
28.23k points
Mean multithread perf.
210.4k points
551.1k points

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i7-1165G7
E5-2680 v2
Test#1 (Integers)
14.48k
11.96k (x0.83)
Test#2 (FP)
24.18k
10.73k (x0.44)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
11.95k
4.59k (x0.38)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.01k
4.31k (x0.39)
TOTAL
61.62k
31.6k (x0.51)

Multithread

i7-1165G7

E5-2680 v2
Test#1 (Integers)
50.98k
218.24k (x4.28)
Test#2 (FP)
80.7k
206.92k (x2.56)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
36.61k
100.37k (x2.74)
Test#1 (Memory)
12.02k
11.45k (x0.95)
TOTAL
180.32k
536.99k (x2.98)

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i7-1165G7
E5-2680 v2
Test#1 (Integers)
16.27k
10.55k (x0.65)
Test#2 (FP)
25.74k
10.02k (x0.39)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
11.5k
3.99k (x0.35)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.82k
3.66k (x0.34)
TOTAL
64.32k
28.23k (x0.44)

Multithread

i7-1165G7

E5-2680 v2
Test#1 (Integers)
54k
215.04k (x3.98)
Test#2 (FP)
88.76k
230.43k (x2.6)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
35.23k
96.87k (x2.75)
Test#1 (Memory)
12.14k
8.76k (x0.72)
TOTAL
190.12k
551.1k (x2.9)

Performance/W
i7-1165G7
E5-2680 v2
Test#1 (Integers)
1928 points/W
1870 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3170 points/W
2004 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1258 points/W
842 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
434 points/W
76 points/W
TOTAL
6790 points/W
4792 points/W

Performance/GHz
i7-1165G7
E5-2680 v2
Test#1 (Integers)
3462 points/GHz
2931 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5476 points/GHz
2784 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2447 points/GHz
1109 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2302 points/GHz
1017 points/GHz
TOTAL
13686 points/GHz
7841 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4