Core i7-1165G7 vs Xeon E5-2620 v4
Description
The i7-1165G7 is based on Tiger Lake architecture while the E5-2620 v4 is based on Broadwell.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-1165G7 gets a score of 210.4 k points while the E5-2620 v4 gets 237.8 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2620 v4 is 1.1 times faster than the i7-1165G7. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-1165G7 gets a score of 210.4 k points while the E5-2620 v4 gets 237.8 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2620 v4 is 1.1 times faster than the i7-1165G7. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
806c1
406f1
Core
Tiger Lake-UP3
Broadwell-EP
Base frecuency
2.8 GHz
2.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.7 GHz
3 GHz
Socket
BGA 1449
Socket 2011-3
Cores/Threads
4/8
8/16
TDP
28 W
85 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x48 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
4x1280 kB
8x256 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
20480 kB
Date
September 2020
March 2016
Mean monothread perf.
62.1k points
29.39k points
Mean multithread perf.
210.4k points
237.83k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i7-1165G7
E5-2620 v4
Test#1 (Integers)
4.26k
2.6k (x0.61)
Test#2 (FP)
19.54k
7.55k (x0.39)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.95k
2.61k (x0.24)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.08k
2.03k (x0.18)
TOTAL
45.84k
14.79k (x0.32)
Multithread
i7-1165G7
E5-2620 v4
Test#1 (Integers)
15.69k
17.41k (x1.11)
Test#2 (FP)
68.3k
75.46k (x1.1)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
33.66k
26.25k (x0.78)
Test#1 (Memory)
12.16k
4.65k (x0.38)
TOTAL
129.81k
123.78k (x0.95)
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i7-1165G7
E5-2620 v4
Test#1 (Integers)
14.48k
8.22k (x0.57)
Test#2 (FP)
24.18k
12.06k (x0.5)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
11.95k
4.01k (x0.34)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.01k
2.89k (x0.26)
TOTAL
61.62k
27.18k (x0.44)
Multithread
i7-1165G7
E5-2620 v4
Test#1 (Integers)
50.98k
61.34k (x1.2)
Test#2 (FP)
80.7k
90.21k (x1.12)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
36.61k
26.2k (x0.72)
Test#1 (Memory)
12.02k
4.62k (x0.38)
TOTAL
180.32k
182.37k (x1.01)
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i7-1165G7
E5-2620 v4
Test#1 (Integers)
16.27k
6.04k (x0.37)
Test#2 (FP)
25.74k
10.18k (x0.4)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
11.5k
2.74k (x0.24)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.82k
2.41k (x0.22)
TOTAL
64.32k
21.37k (x0.33)
Multithread
i7-1165G7
E5-2620 v4
Test#1 (Integers)
54k
47.51k (x0.88)
Test#2 (FP)
88.76k
75.12k (x0.85)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
35.23k
19.72k (x0.56)
Test#1 (Memory)
12.14k
5.45k (x0.45)
TOTAL
190.12k
147.8k (x0.78)
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-1165G7
E5-2620 v4
Test#1 (Integers)
22.97k
12.16k (x0.53)
Test#2 (FP)
21.61k
11.82k (x0.55)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.99k
3.02k (x0.34)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.52k
2.4k (x0.28)
TOTAL
62.1k
29.39k (x0.47)
Multithread
i7-1165G7
E5-2620 v4
Test#1 (Integers)
82.75k
103.77k (x1.25)
Test#2 (FP)
86.58k
102.28k (x1.18)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
29.34k
26.13k (x0.89)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.72k
5.65k (x0.48)
TOTAL
210.4k
237.83k (x1.13)
Performance/W
i7-1165G7
E5-2620 v4
Test#1 (Integers)
2955 points/W
1221 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3092 points/W
1203 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1048 points/W
307 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
419 points/W
66 points/W
TOTAL
7514 points/W
2798 points/W
Performance/GHz
i7-1165G7
E5-2620 v4
Test#1 (Integers)
4887 points/GHz
4054 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4599 points/GHz
3939 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1912 points/GHz
1005 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1813 points/GHz
799 points/GHz
TOTAL
13212 points/GHz
9798 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4