Core i7-1165G7 vs Xeon E5-2620
Description
The i7-1165G7 is based on Tiger Lake architecture while the E5-2620 is based on Sandy Bridge.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-1165G7 gets a score of 190.1 k points while the E5-2620 gets 224.7 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2620 is 1.2 times faster than the i7-1165G7. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-1165G7 gets a score of 190.1 k points while the E5-2620 gets 224.7 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2620 is 1.2 times faster than the i7-1165G7. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
806c1
206d7
Core
Tiger Lake-UP3
Sandy Bridge-EP
Base frecuency
2.8 GHz
2 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.7 GHz
2.5 GHz
Socket
BGA 1449
LGA 2011
Cores/Threads
4/8
6/12
TDP
28 W
95 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x48 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
4x1280 kB
6x256 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
15360 kB
Date
September 2020
March 2012
Mean monothread perf.
62.1k points
18.8k points
Mean multithread perf.
210.4k points
224.7k points
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i7-1165G7
E5-2620
Test#1 (Integers)
16.27k
6.95k (x0.43)
Test#2 (FP)
25.74k
6.24k (x0.24)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
11.5k
3.05k (x0.27)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.82k
2.56k (x0.24)
TOTAL
64.32k
18.8k (x0.29)
Multithread
i7-1165G7
E5-2620
Test#1 (Integers)
54k
90.01k (x1.67)
Test#2 (FP)
88.76k
82.43k (x0.93)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
35.23k
42.59k (x1.21)
Test#1 (Memory)
12.14k
9.66k (x0.8)
TOTAL
190.12k
224.7k (x1.18)
Performance/W
i7-1165G7
E5-2620
Test#1 (Integers)
1928 points/W
948 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3170 points/W
868 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1258 points/W
448 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
434 points/W
102 points/W
TOTAL
6790 points/W
2365 points/W
Performance/GHz
i7-1165G7
E5-2620
Test#1 (Integers)
3462 points/GHz
2780 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5476 points/GHz
2494 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2447 points/GHz
1220 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2302 points/GHz
1024 points/GHz
TOTAL
13686 points/GHz
7519 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4