| | | | | | |

Core i7-1165G7 vs i7-7820HQ


Description
The i7-1165G7 is based on Tiger Lake architecture while the i7-7820HQ is based on Kaby Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-1165G7 gets a score of 210.4 k points while the i7-7820HQ gets 196.6 k points.

Summarizing, the i7-1165G7 is 1.1 times faster than the i7-7820HQ. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
806c1
906e9
Core
Tiger Lake-UP3
Kaby Lake-H
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.8 GHz
2.9 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.7 GHz
3.9 GHz
Socket
BGA 1449
BGA 1440
Cores/Threads
4/8
4/8
TDP
28 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x48 kB
4x32+x4x32 kB
Cache L2
4x1280 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
8192 kB
Date
September 2020
January 2017
Mean monothread perf.
62.1k points
55.85k points
Mean multithread perf.
210.4k points
196.55k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-1165G7
i7-7820HQ
Test#1 (Integers)
22.97k
23.23k (x1.01)
Test#2 (FP)
21.61k
20.13k (x0.93)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.99k
4.57k (x0.51)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.52k
7.92k (x0.93)
TOTAL
62.1k
55.85k (x0.9)

Multithread

i7-1165G7

i7-7820HQ
Test#1 (Integers)
82.75k
85.54k (x1.03)
Test#2 (FP)
86.58k
87.07k (x1.01)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
29.34k
20.37k (x0.69)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.72k
3.57k (x0.3)
TOTAL
210.4k
196.55k (x0.93)

Performance/W
i7-1165G7
i7-7820HQ
Test#1 (Integers)
2955 points/W
1901 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3092 points/W
1935 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1048 points/W
453 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
419 points/W
79 points/W
TOTAL
7514 points/W
4368 points/W

Performance/GHz
i7-1165G7
i7-7820HQ
Test#1 (Integers)
4887 points/GHz
5956 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4599 points/GHz
5163 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1912 points/GHz
1172 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1813 points/GHz
2030 points/GHz
TOTAL
13212 points/GHz
14321 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4