Core i7-1165G7 vs i5-8259U
Description
The i7-1165G7 is based on Tiger Lake architecture while the i5-8259U is based on Coffee Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-1165G7 gets a score of 210.4 k points while the i5-8259U gets 229 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-8259U is 1.1 times faster than the i7-1165G7. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-1165G7 gets a score of 210.4 k points while the i5-8259U gets 229 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-8259U is 1.1 times faster than the i7-1165G7. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
806c1
806ea
Core
Tiger Lake-UP3
Coffee Lake-U
Base frecuency
2.8 GHz
2.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.7 GHz
3.8 GHz
Socket
BGA 1449
BGA 1528
Cores/Threads
4/8
4/8
TDP
28 W
28 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x48 kB
4x32+x4x32 kB
Cache L2
4x1280 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
6144 kB
Date
September 2020
March 2018
Mean monothread perf.
62.1k points
54.55k points
Mean multithread perf.
210.4k points
229k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-1165G7
i5-8259U
Test#1 (Integers)
22.97k
21.06k (x0.92)
Test#2 (FP)
21.61k
19.79k (x0.92)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.99k
4.72k (x0.52)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.52k
8.98k (x1.05)
TOTAL
62.1k
54.55k (x0.88)
Multithread
i7-1165G7
i5-8259U
Test#1 (Integers)
82.75k
96.43k (x1.17)
Test#2 (FP)
86.58k
85.46k (x0.99)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
29.34k
22.31k (x0.76)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.72k
24.81k (x2.12)
TOTAL
210.4k
229k (x1.09)
Performance/W
i7-1165G7
i5-8259U
Test#1 (Integers)
2955 points/W
3444 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3092 points/W
3052 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1048 points/W
797 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
419 points/W
886 points/W
TOTAL
7514 points/W
8179 points/W
Performance/GHz
i7-1165G7
i5-8259U
Test#1 (Integers)
4887 points/GHz
5543 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4599 points/GHz
5208 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1912 points/GHz
1241 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1813 points/GHz
2363 points/GHz
TOTAL
13212 points/GHz
14355 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4