| | | | | | |

Core i7-1165G7 vs Ryzen Z1 Extreme


Description
The i7-1165G7 is based on Tiger Lake architecture while the Z1 Extreme is based on Zen 4.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-1165G7 gets a score of 210.4 k points while the Z1 Extreme gets 553.4 k points.

Summarizing, the Z1 Extreme is 2.6 times faster than the i7-1165G7. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
806c1
a70f41
Core
Tiger Lake-UP3
Phoenix
Architecture
Tiger Lake
Base frecuency
2.8 GHz
3.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.7 GHz
5.1 GHz
Socket
BGA 1449
BGA
Cores/Threads
4/8
8/16
TDP
28 W
30 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x48 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
4x1280 kB
8x1024 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
16384 kB
Date
September 2020
June 2023
Mean monothread perf.
62.1k points
101.73k points
Mean multithread perf.
210.4k points
553.41k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-1165G7
Z1 Extreme
Test#1 (Integers)
22.97k
32.74k (x1.43)
Test#2 (FP)
21.61k
27.35k (x1.27)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.99k
14.23k (x1.58)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.52k
27.41k (x3.22)
TOTAL
62.1k
101.73k (x1.64)

Multithread

i7-1165G7

Z1 Extreme
Test#1 (Integers)
82.75k
236.69k (x2.86)
Test#2 (FP)
86.58k
202.63k (x2.34)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
29.34k
102.8k (x3.5)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.72k
11.28k (x0.96)
TOTAL
210.4k
553.41k (x2.63)

Performance/W
i7-1165G7
Z1 Extreme
Test#1 (Integers)
2955 points/W
7890 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3092 points/W
6754 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1048 points/W
3427 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
419 points/W
376 points/W
TOTAL
7514 points/W
18447 points/W

Performance/GHz
i7-1165G7
Z1 Extreme
Test#1 (Integers)
4887 points/GHz
6419 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4599 points/GHz
5363 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1912 points/GHz
2789 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1813 points/GHz
5375 points/GHz
TOTAL
13212 points/GHz
19946 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4