| | | | | | |

Core i7-1165G7 vs Ryzen 7 2700X


Description
The i7-1165G7 is based on Tiger Lake architecture while the 2700X is based on Zen+.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-1165G7 gets a score of 210.4 k points while the 2700X gets 431.1 k points.

Summarizing, the 2700X is 2 times faster than the i7-1165G7. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
806c1
800f82
Core
Tiger Lake-UP3
Pinnacle Ridge
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.8 GHz
3.7 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.7 GHz
4.3 GHz
Socket
BGA 1449
AM4
Cores/Threads
4/8
8/16
TDP
28 W
105 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x48 kB
8x64+8x32 kB
Cache L2
4x1280 kB
8x512 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
16384 kB
Date
September 2020
April 2018
Mean monothread perf.
62.1k points
64.83k points
Mean multithread perf.
210.4k points
431.14k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i7-1165G7
2700X
Test#1 (Integers)
4.26k
4.25k (x1)
Test#2 (FP)
19.54k
19.72k (x1.01)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.95k
5.84k (x0.53)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.08k
21.36k (x1.93)
TOTAL
45.84k
51.17k (x1.12)

Multithread

i7-1165G7

2700X
Test#1 (Integers)
15.69k
35.04k (x2.23)
Test#2 (FP)
68.3k
181.42k (x2.66)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
33.66k
64.86k (x1.93)
Test#1 (Memory)
12.16k
8.21k (x0.67)
TOTAL
129.81k
289.54k (x2.23)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i7-1165G7
2700X
Test#1 (Integers)
14.48k
15.22k (x1.05)
Test#2 (FP)
24.18k
24.12k (x1)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
11.95k
5.87k (x0.49)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.01k
21k (x1.91)
TOTAL
61.62k
66.21k (x1.07)

Multithread

i7-1165G7

2700X
Test#1 (Integers)
50.98k
126.81k (x2.49)
Test#2 (FP)
80.7k
229.86k (x2.85)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
36.61k
61.74k (x1.69)
Test#1 (Memory)
12.02k
9.77k (x0.81)
TOTAL
180.32k
428.19k (x2.37)

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i7-1165G7
2700X
Test#1 (Integers)
16.27k
14.44k (x0.89)
Test#2 (FP)
25.74k
24.92k (x0.97)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
11.5k
5.8k (x0.5)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.82k
19.07k (x1.76)
TOTAL
64.32k
64.24k (x1)

Multithread

i7-1165G7

2700X
Test#1 (Integers)
54k
122.01k (x2.26)
Test#2 (FP)
88.76k
220.34k (x2.48)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
35.23k
59.89k (x1.7)
Test#1 (Memory)
12.14k
9.9k (x0.82)
TOTAL
190.12k
412.13k (x2.17)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-1165G7
2700X
Test#1 (Integers)
22.97k
15.34k (x0.67)
Test#2 (FP)
21.61k
25.75k (x1.19)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.99k
5.79k (x0.64)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.52k
17.95k (x2.11)
TOTAL
62.1k
64.83k (x1.04)

Multithread

i7-1165G7

2700X
Test#1 (Integers)
82.75k
123.07k (x1.49)
Test#2 (FP)
86.58k
239.3k (x2.76)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
29.34k
60.6k (x2.07)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.72k
8.18k (x0.7)
TOTAL
210.4k
431.14k (x2.05)

Performance/W
i7-1165G7
2700X
Test#1 (Integers)
2955 points/W
1172 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3092 points/W
2279 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1048 points/W
577 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
419 points/W
78 points/W
TOTAL
7514 points/W
4106 points/W

Performance/GHz
i7-1165G7
2700X
Test#1 (Integers)
4887 points/GHz
3568 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4599 points/GHz
5987 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1912 points/GHz
1347 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1813 points/GHz
4175 points/GHz
TOTAL
13212 points/GHz
15078 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4