| | | | | | |

Core i7-1165G7 vs Ryzen 5 5500U


Description
The i7-1165G7 is based on Tiger Lake architecture while the 5500U is based on Zen 2.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-1165G7 gets a score of 210.4 k points while the 5500U gets 261.9 k points.

Summarizing, the 5500U is 1.2 times faster than the i7-1165G7. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
806c1
860f81
Core
Tiger Lake-UP3
Lucienne
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.8 GHz
2.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.7 GHz
4 GHz
Socket
BGA 1449
BGA 1140
Cores/Threads
4/8
6/12
TDP
28 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x48 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
4x1280 kB
6x512 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
2x4096 kB
Date
September 2020
March 2021
Mean monothread perf.
62.1k points
53.76k points
Mean multithread perf.
210.4k points
261.91k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-1165G7
5500U
Test#1 (Integers)
22.97k
15.63k (x0.68)
Test#2 (FP)
21.61k
23k (x1.06)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.99k
8.62k (x0.96)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.52k
6.51k (x0.76)
TOTAL
62.1k
53.76k (x0.87)

Multithread

i7-1165G7

5500U
Test#1 (Integers)
82.75k
90.38k (x1.09)
Test#2 (FP)
86.58k
118.74k (x1.37)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
29.34k
48.39k (x1.65)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.72k
4.4k (x0.38)
TOTAL
210.4k
261.91k (x1.24)

Performance/W
i7-1165G7
5500U
Test#1 (Integers)
2955 points/W
6025 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3092 points/W
7916 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1048 points/W
3226 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
419 points/W
294 points/W
TOTAL
7514 points/W
17461 points/W

Performance/GHz
i7-1165G7
5500U
Test#1 (Integers)
4887 points/GHz
3908 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4599 points/GHz
5750 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1912 points/GHz
2156 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1813 points/GHz
1628 points/GHz
TOTAL
13212 points/GHz
13441 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4