| | | | | | |

Core i7-1165G7 vs i9-12900KF


Description
The i7-1165G7 is based on Tiger Lake architecture while the i9-12900KF is based on Alder Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-1165G7 gets a score of 210.4 k points while the i9-12900KF gets 1219.3 k points.

Summarizing, the i9-12900KF is 5.8 times faster than the i7-1165G7. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
806c1
90672
Core
Tiger Lake-UP3
Alder Lake-S
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.8 GHz
3.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.7 GHz
5.2 GHz
Socket
BGA 1449
LGA 1700
Cores/Threads
4/8
16/24
TDP
28 W
125 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x48 kB
8x32/8x64+8x48/8x32 kB
Cache L2
4x1280 kB
8x1280+8x2048 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
30720 kB
Date
September 2020
November 2021
Mean monothread perf.
62.1k points
120.97k points
Mean multithread perf.
210.4k points
1219.33k points

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i7-1165G7
i9-12900KF
Test#1 (Integers)
16.27k
28.96k (x1.78)
Test#2 (FP)
25.74k
30k (x1.17)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
11.5k
16.94k (x1.47)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.82k
17.14k (x1.58)
TOTAL
64.32k
93.05k (x1.45)

Multithread

i7-1165G7

i9-12900KF
Test#1 (Integers)
54k
166.25k (x3.08)
Test#2 (FP)
88.76k
172.03k (x1.94)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
35.23k
96.95k (x2.75)
Test#1 (Memory)
12.14k
55.78k (x4.59)
TOTAL
190.12k
491.01k (x2.58)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-1165G7
i9-12900KF
Test#1 (Integers)
22.97k
57.05k (x2.48)
Test#2 (FP)
21.61k
29.66k (x1.37)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.99k
16.48k (x1.83)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.52k
17.78k (x2.09)
TOTAL
62.1k
120.97k (x1.95)

Multithread

i7-1165G7

i9-12900KF
Test#1 (Integers)
82.75k
546.04k (x6.6)
Test#2 (FP)
86.58k
437.01k (x5.05)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
29.34k
211.36k (x7.2)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.72k
24.92k (x2.13)
TOTAL
210.4k
1219.33k (x5.8)

Performance/W
i7-1165G7
i9-12900KF
Test#1 (Integers)
2955 points/W
4368 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3092 points/W
3496 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1048 points/W
1691 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
419 points/W
199 points/W
TOTAL
7514 points/W
9755 points/W

Performance/GHz
i7-1165G7
i9-12900KF
Test#1 (Integers)
4887 points/GHz
10972 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4599 points/GHz
5704 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1912 points/GHz
3170 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1813 points/GHz
3419 points/GHz
TOTAL
13212 points/GHz
23264 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4