Core i7-1165G7 vs i5-12400F
Description
The i7-1165G7 is based on Tiger Lake architecture while the i5-12400F is based on Alder Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-1165G7 gets a score of 210.4 k points while the i5-12400F gets 399.4 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-12400F is 1.9 times faster than the i7-1165G7. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-1165G7 gets a score of 210.4 k points while the i5-12400F gets 399.4 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-12400F is 1.9 times faster than the i7-1165G7. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
806c1
90675
Core
Tiger Lake-UP3
Alder Lake-S
Base frecuency
2.8 GHz
2.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.7 GHz
4.4 GHz
Socket
BGA 1449
LGA 1700
Cores/Threads
4/8
6/12
TDP
28 W
117 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x48 kB
6x32/0x64+6x48/0x32 kB
Cache L2
4x1280 kB
6x1280+0x2048 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
18432 kB
Date
September 2020
January 2022
Mean monothread perf.
62.1k points
76.46k points
Mean multithread perf.
210.4k points
399.39k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i7-1165G7
i5-12400F
Test#1 (Integers)
4.26k
7.43k (x1.74)
Test#2 (FP)
19.54k
18.64k (x0.95)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.95k
13.15k (x1.2)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.08k
14.82k (x1.34)
TOTAL
45.84k
54.04k (x1.18)
Multithread
i7-1165G7
i5-12400F
Test#1 (Integers)
15.69k
36.23k (x2.31)
Test#2 (FP)
68.3k
134.76k (x1.97)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
33.66k
84.06k (x2.5)
Test#1 (Memory)
12.16k
16.71k (x1.37)
TOTAL
129.81k
271.76k (x2.09)
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i7-1165G7
i5-12400F
Test#1 (Integers)
14.48k
24.18k (x1.67)
Test#2 (FP)
24.18k
23.85k (x0.99)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
11.95k
14.42k (x1.21)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.01k
14.87k (x1.35)
TOTAL
61.62k
77.32k (x1.25)
Multithread
i7-1165G7
i5-12400F
Test#1 (Integers)
50.98k
122.98k (x2.41)
Test#2 (FP)
80.7k
168.77k (x2.09)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
36.61k
96.11k (x2.63)
Test#1 (Memory)
12.02k
16.32k (x1.36)
TOTAL
180.32k
404.19k (x2.24)
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i7-1165G7
i5-12400F
Test#1 (Integers)
16.27k
24.24k (x1.49)
Test#2 (FP)
25.74k
24.74k (x0.96)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
11.5k
13.95k (x1.21)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.82k
14.47k (x1.34)
TOTAL
64.32k
77.41k (x1.2)
Multithread
i7-1165G7
i5-12400F
Test#1 (Integers)
54k
126.87k (x2.35)
Test#2 (FP)
88.76k
186.48k (x2.1)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
35.23k
92.37k (x2.62)
Test#1 (Memory)
12.14k
15.45k (x1.27)
TOTAL
190.12k
421.18k (x2.22)
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-1165G7
i5-12400F
Test#1 (Integers)
22.97k
33.85k (x1.47)
Test#2 (FP)
21.61k
20.33k (x0.94)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.99k
10.51k (x1.17)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.52k
11.77k (x1.38)
TOTAL
62.1k
76.46k (x1.23)
Multithread
i7-1165G7
i5-12400F
Test#1 (Integers)
82.75k
174.21k (x2.11)
Test#2 (FP)
86.58k
141.31k (x1.63)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
29.34k
64.86k (x2.21)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.72k
19.01k (x1.62)
TOTAL
210.4k
399.39k (x1.9)
Performance/W
i7-1165G7
i5-12400F
Test#1 (Integers)
2955 points/W
1489 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3092 points/W
1208 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1048 points/W
554 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
419 points/W
162 points/W
TOTAL
7514 points/W
3414 points/W
Performance/GHz
i7-1165G7
i5-12400F
Test#1 (Integers)
4887 points/GHz
7693 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4599 points/GHz
4621 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1912 points/GHz
2389 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1813 points/GHz
2675 points/GHz
TOTAL
13212 points/GHz
17378 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4