| | | | | | |

Core i5-11400T vs Xeon W-2223


Description
The i5-11400T is based on Rocket Lake architecture while the W-2223 is based on Cascade Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-11400T gets a score of 67.1 k points while the W-2223 gets 104.5 k points.

Summarizing, the W-2223 is 1.6 times faster than the i5-11400T. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
a0671
50657
Core
Rocket Lake-S
Glacier Falls
Architecture
Base frecuency
1.3 GHz
3.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.7 GHz
3.9 GHz
Socket
LGA 1200
LGA 2066
Cores/Threads
6/12
4/8
TDP
35 W
120 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x48 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
6x512 kB
4x1024 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
8448 kB
Date
March 2021
October 2019
Mean monothread perf.
31.39k points
59.68k points
Mean multithread perf.
67.1k points
243.18k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i5-11400T
W-2223
Test#1 (Integers)
3.51k
3.97k (x1.13)
Test#2 (FP)
14.2k
14.5k (x1.02)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
7.63k
4.78k (x0.63)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.06k
8.19k (x1.35)
TOTAL
31.39k
31.45k (x1)

Multithread

i5-11400T

W-2223
Test#1 (Integers)
7.4k
15.56k (x2.1)
Test#2 (FP)
31.37k
59.23k (x1.89)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
18.11k
22.87k (x1.26)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.23k
6.85k (x0.67)
TOTAL
67.1k
104.51k (x1.56)

Performance/W
i5-11400T
W-2223
Test#1 (Integers)
211 points/W
130 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
896 points/W
494 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
518 points/W
191 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
292 points/W
57 points/W
TOTAL
1917 points/W
871 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-11400T
W-2223
Test#1 (Integers)
948 points/GHz
1018 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3838 points/GHz
3718 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2062 points/GHz
1227 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1637 points/GHz
2101 points/GHz
TOTAL
8485 points/GHz
8064 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4