| | | | | | |

Core i5-11400T vs Xeon Silver 4208


Description
The i5-11400T is based on Rocket Lake architecture while the Silver 4208 is based on Cascade Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-11400T gets a score of 67.1 k points while the Silver 4208 gets 141.3 k points.

Summarizing, the Silver 4208 is 2.1 times faster than the i5-11400T. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
a0671
50657
Core
Rocket Lake-S
Cascade Lake-SP
Architecture
Base frecuency
1.3 GHz
2.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.7 GHz
3.2 GHz
Socket
LGA 1200
LGA 3647
Cores/Threads
6/12
8/16
TDP
35 W
85 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x48 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
6x512 kB
8x1024 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
11264 kB
Date
March 2021
April 2019
Mean monothread perf.
31.39k points
38.61k points
Mean multithread perf.
67.1k points
311.57k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i5-11400T
Silver 4208
Test#1 (Integers)
3.51k
2.59k (x0.74)
Test#2 (FP)
14.2k
9.5k (x0.67)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
7.63k
3.15k (x0.41)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.06k
5.9k (x0.97)
TOTAL
31.39k
21.13k (x0.67)

Multithread

i5-11400T

Silver 4208
Test#1 (Integers)
7.4k
21.09k (x2.85)
Test#2 (FP)
31.37k
80.93k (x2.58)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
18.11k
30.76k (x1.7)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.23k
8.51k (x0.83)
TOTAL
67.1k
141.3k (x2.11)

Performance/W
i5-11400T
Silver 4208
Test#1 (Integers)
211 points/W
248 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
896 points/W
952 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
518 points/W
362 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
292 points/W
100 points/W
TOTAL
1917 points/W
1662 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-11400T
Silver 4208
Test#1 (Integers)
948 points/GHz
809 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3838 points/GHz
2968 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2062 points/GHz
983 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1637 points/GHz
1843 points/GHz
TOTAL
8485 points/GHz
6604 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4