| | | | | | |

Core i5-11400T vs Xeon E5-2697 v2


Description
The i5-11400T is based on Rocket Lake architecture while the E5-2697 v2 is based on Ivy Bridge.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-11400T gets a score of 67.1 k points while the E5-2697 v2 gets 419.1 k points.

Summarizing, the E5-2697 v2 is 6.2 times faster than the i5-11400T. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
a0671
306e4
Core
Rocket Lake-S
Ivy Bridge-EP
Architecture
Base frecuency
1.3 GHz
2.7 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.7 GHz
3.5 GHz
Socket
LGA 1200
LGA 2011
Cores/Threads
6/12
12 /24
TDP
35 W
130 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x48 kB
12x32+12x32 kB
Cache L2
6x512 kB
12x256 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
30720 kB
Date
March 2021
September 2013
Mean monothread perf.
31.39k points
27.92k points
Mean multithread perf.
67.1k points
633.14k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i5-11400T
E5-2697 v2
Test#1 (Integers)
3.51k
3.44k (x0.98)
Test#2 (FP)
14.2k
9.54k (x0.67)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
7.63k
4.21k (x0.55)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.06k
3.94k (x0.65)
TOTAL
31.39k
21.13k (x0.67)

Multithread

i5-11400T

E5-2697 v2
Test#1 (Integers)
7.4k
73.17k (x9.89)
Test#2 (FP)
31.37k
230.83k (x7.36)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
18.11k
107.14k (x5.91)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.23k
7.99k (x0.78)
TOTAL
67.1k
419.12k (x6.25)

Performance/W
i5-11400T
E5-2697 v2
Test#1 (Integers)
211 points/W
563 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
896 points/W
1776 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
518 points/W
824 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
292 points/W
61 points/W
TOTAL
1917 points/W
3224 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-11400T
E5-2697 v2
Test#1 (Integers)
948 points/GHz
982 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3838 points/GHz
2726 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2062 points/GHz
1203 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1637 points/GHz
1126 points/GHz
TOTAL
8485 points/GHz
6036 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4